Zhu Siwei, Lv Kangjuan, Zhao Ye
SILC Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 201899, China.
School of Economics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Jan;373:123689. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123689. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
We examine whether and how the different types of digital technology innovation (DTI) affect corporate ESG performance. Based on patents' information, we classify DTI into symbolic DTI and substantive DTI. Specifically, symbolic DTI is the innovation driven by firms' legitimacy strategy, while substantive DTI is the type of innovation that helps strengthen firms' competitive advantages. Using a sample of Chinese A-share-listed firms from 2009 to 2020, we use polynomial regression and response surface analysis to examine how firms balance the tension between competitiveness and legitimacy through digital technological innovations in order to achieve optimal corporate ESG performance. We find that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between symbolic DTI and corporate ESG performance. Meanwhile, there is a simple positive correlation between substantive DTI and corporate ESG performance. Moreover, the incongruence between the two types of DTI significantly hurts corporate ESG performance and is mainly concentrated in firms with high symbolic-low substantive DTI strategy. Further analyses show that corporate managerial myopia positively (negatively) affects the relationship between symbolic (substantive) DTI and ESG performance. Our paper expands the literature on the relationship between DTI and firms' ESG performance. It provides managerial insights for the Chinese government to encourage digital economy development and promotes firms' substantive DTI to enhance their ESG performance.
我们研究不同类型的数字技术创新(DTI)是否以及如何影响企业的ESG绩效。基于专利信息,我们将DTI分为象征性DTI和实质性DTI。具体而言,象征性DTI是由企业的合法性战略驱动的创新,而实质性DTI是有助于增强企业竞争优势的创新类型。以2009年至2020年中国A股上市公司为样本,我们使用多项式回归和响应面分析来研究企业如何通过数字技术创新平衡竞争力与合法性之间的张力,以实现最佳的企业ESG绩效。我们发现象征性DTI与企业ESG绩效之间存在倒U形关系。同时,实质性DTI与企业ESG绩效之间存在简单的正相关关系。此外,两种类型的DTI之间的不一致显著损害企业ESG绩效,且主要集中在高象征性-低实质性DTI战略的企业中。进一步分析表明,企业管理者短视正向(负向)影响象征性(实质性)DTI与ESG绩效之间的关系。我们的论文扩展了关于DTI与企业ESG绩效关系的文献。它为中国政府鼓励数字经济发展提供了管理见解,并促进企业的实质性DTI以提高其ESG绩效。