Winthrop J D, Balfe D M, Shackelford G D, McAlister W H, Rosenblum J L, Siegel M J
Radiology. 1985 Mar;154(3):657-60. doi: 10.1148/radiology.154.3.3969468.
The authors reviewed 49 double-contrast and 27 single-contrast barium-enema examinations (BE) in 71 children with suspected inflammatory bowel disease. The diagnosis was proved in 41 patients, of whom 36 underwent proctoscopy and 5 had advanced disease which was treated surgically within 3 to 30 days after BE; the other 30 children served as controls. BE and proctoscopy were compared with regard to sensitivity (detection of disease) and accuracy (categorization as ulcerative or granulomatous colitis). Sensitivity was 93% for double-contrast and 82% for single-contrast BE. Both detected all cases of advanced disease; in early disease, double-contrast BE detected 91% of cases and single-contrast BE 70%. Colitis was correctly categorized as ulcerative or granulomatous in 93% with double-contrast BE and 86% with single-contrast BE. Specificity within the control group was 100% with both techniques. The authors conclude that both types of BE exhibit similar sensitivity in advanced disease, but the double-contrast technique is more accurate in detecting early disease.
作者回顾了71例疑似炎性肠病患儿的49次双重对比钡剂灌肠检查(BE)和27次单对比钡剂灌肠检查。41例患者确诊,其中36例行直肠镜检查,5例病情进展,在BE后3至30天内接受手术治疗;另外30名儿童作为对照。对BE和直肠镜检查在敏感性(疾病检测)和准确性(分类为溃疡性或肉芽肿性结肠炎)方面进行了比较。双重对比BE的敏感性为93%,单对比BE为82%。两者均检测出所有病情进展的病例;在早期疾病中,双重对比BE检测出91%的病例,单对比BE检测出70%。双重对比BE将结肠炎正确分类为溃疡性或肉芽肿性的比例为93%,单对比BE为86%。两种技术在对照组中的特异性均为100%。作者得出结论,两种类型的BE在病情进展的疾病中表现出相似的敏感性,但双重对比技术在检测早期疾病方面更准确。