Zhang Xiaofang, Peck Carl C, Wang Yaning, Szucs Thomas D, Sun Wan, Bai Xue, Chen Siyu, Wang Fengzhi, Wu Yangfeng
Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Clinical Research Institute, Institute of Advanced Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China.
BMC Med. 2024 Dec 18;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03800-6.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Accelerated Approval (AA) pathway has increasingly used to authorize market approval of new drugs amid controversy. The present study aims to inform the most recent data on the strength of clinical evidence supporting such approvals.
Evidentiary characteristics of pre-approval pivotal clinical studies and regulator-required post-approval confirmatory studies supporting AAs between 2015 and 2022 were extracted from publicly available FDA documents. Descriptive analyses were conducted for each of the characteristic including study design, study phase, primary endpoint, number of participants, and magnitude of effect. Trends of these characteristics over time were documented and accounted for class of drugs, application type, novelty, orphan status, and oncology/non-oncology indications.
During 2015-2022, 156 drug-indication pairs received AA. To support these AAs, 77% of pre-approval pivotal trials employed single-arm designs, and 22% were phase I trials, with a median of 92 participants (IQR, 45-125); 61% of post-approval confirmatory studies were required by FDA to use randomized controlled design, 25% to use clinical endpoints, and 33% specified the number of participants requirement. During the 8-year observation period, the pairs approved via AA pathway almost tripled from 20 (2015-2016) to 59 (2019-2020) and fell to 36 (2021-2022); the corresponding proportion to all new drug approvals showed the same trend. Single-arm pre-approval pivotal studies increased from 55% (2015-2016) to 91% (2019-2020) and fell to 69% (2021-2022), while the median number of participants decreased from 106 (2015-2016) to 59 (2019-2020) and rose to 106 (2021-2022). Randomized controlled post-approval confirmatory studies decreased from 75% (2015-2016) to 42% (2019-2020) and rebounded to 75% (2021-2022), while those using surrogate endpoints increased from 50% (2015-2016) to 72% (2021-2022). Analyses adjusting for drug class, application type, novelty, orphan status, and oncology/non-oncology showed similar results.
The number of drug-indication pairs receiving AA increased sharply during 2015-2016 to 2019-2020 but fell in 2021-2022. Meanwhile, the strength of clinical evidence supporting FDA's AAs appeared to decline from 2015 to 2020 but seems to have improved in 2021-2022. Measures should be taken to further improve the strength of evidence in Accelerated Approvals.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的加速批准(AA)途径在争议声中越来越多地被用于批准新药上市。本研究旨在提供有关支持此类批准的临床证据强度的最新数据。
从公开可得的FDA文件中提取2015年至2022年间支持加速批准的批准前关键临床研究和监管机构要求的批准后验证性研究的证据特征。对每个特征进行描述性分析,包括研究设计、研究阶段、主要终点、参与者数量和效应大小。记录这些特征随时间的趋势,并考虑药物类别、申请类型、新颖性、孤儿药状态以及肿瘤学/非肿瘤学适应症。
在2015 - 2022年期间,156个药物 - 适应症组合获得了加速批准。为支持这些加速批准,77%的批准前关键试验采用单臂设计,22%为I期试验,参与者中位数为92人(四分位间距,45 - 125);61%的批准后验证性研究被FDA要求采用随机对照设计,25%采用临床终点,33%规定了参与者数量要求。在8年的观察期内,通过加速批准途径批准的组合从2015 - 2016年的20个几乎增至2019 - 2020年的59个,随后降至2021 - 2022年的36个;其在所有新药批准中的相应比例呈现相同趋势。单臂批准前关键研究从2015 - 2016年的55%增至2019 - 2020年的91%,随后降至2021 - 2022年的69%,而参与者中位数从2015 - 2016年的106人降至2019 - 2020年的59人,随后又升至2021 - 2022年的106人。随机对照批准后验证性研究从2015 - 2016年的75%降至2019 - 2020年的42%,随后反弹至2021 - 2022年的75%,而使用替代终点的研究从2015 - 2016年的50%增至2021 - 2022年的72%。针对药物类别、申请类型、新颖性、孤儿药状态以及肿瘤学/非肿瘤学进行调整后的分析显示了类似结果。
获得加速批准的药物 - 适应症组合数量在2015 - 2016年至2019 - 2020年期间急剧增加,但在2021 - 2022年有所下降。与此同时,支持FDA加速批准的临床证据强度在2015年至2020年期间似乎有所下降,但在2021 - 2022年似乎有所改善。应采取措施进一步提高加速批准中的证据强度。