Gamborg Maria Louise, Salling Lisa Beicker, Rölfing Jan Duedal, Jensen Rune Dall
MidtSim, Central Denmark Region, Hedeager 5, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Hedeager 5, Aarhus, 8200, Denmark.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1451. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06419-6.
Medical education often aims to improve either technical skills (TS) or 'non-technical skills' (NTS) and how these skills influence adverse events and patient safety. The two skill sets are often investigated independently, and little is known about how TS and NTS influence each other. In this scoping review, we therefore aim to investigate the association between TS and NTS.
We conducted a scoping review of four databases in order to summarize, analyse, and collate findings from the included studies.
In total, 203 of 2676 identified studies were included in the final analysis. The first study was published in 1991, but the majority of studies were published in the last decade. The majority were intervention studies including 41 randomized controlled trials. The the objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) was the most common assessment tool with strong validity evidence within TS, but many variations without validity evidence were used. Conversely, Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) was the most used tool with strong validity evidence for assessing NTS. However, the majority of studies used non-validated self-assessment tools to investigate NTS. The correlation between TS and NTS was assessed in 46 of 203 studies, whereof 40 found a positive correlation.
Our findings echo previous literature suggesting that empirical literature investigating the interaction between TS and NTS lack methodological depth. In this review only a minority of the identified studies (n = 46) investigated this correlation. However, the results strongly indicate a correlation between TS and NTS skills, suggesting that physicians who are proficient in their NTS, also perform well on their TS. Thus, the distinction between them in learning designs may seem arbitrary. While this result is promising, the limited methodological rigour indicates a lack of proper understanding of NTS and how to properly assess them.
医学教育通常旨在提高技术技能(TS)或“非技术技能”(NTS),以及这些技能如何影响不良事件和患者安全。这两种技能集通常是独立研究的,而关于TS和NTS如何相互影响却知之甚少。因此,在本范围综述中,我们旨在研究TS和NTS之间的关联。
我们对四个数据库进行了范围综述,以总结、分析和整理纳入研究的结果。
在2676项已识别的研究中,共有203项纳入了最终分析。第一项研究发表于1991年,但大多数研究发表于过去十年。大多数是干预性研究,包括41项随机对照试验。客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)是TS中最常用的评估工具,有强有力的效度证据,但也使用了许多没有效度证据的变体。相反,外科医生非技术技能(NOTSS)是评估NTS时最常用且有强有力效度证据的工具。然而,大多数研究使用未经验证的自我评估工具来研究NTS。在203项研究中的46项中评估了TS和NTS之间的相关性,其中40项发现呈正相关。
我们的研究结果与之前的文献一致,表明研究TS和NTS之间相互作用的实证文献缺乏方法学深度。在本综述中,只有少数已识别的研究(n = 46)调查了这种相关性。然而,结果强烈表明TS和NTS技能之间存在相关性,这表明精通NTS的医生在TS方面也表现出色。因此,在学习设计中对它们进行区分可能显得很随意。虽然这个结果很有前景,但方法学严谨性有限表明对NTS以及如何正确评估它们缺乏适当的理解。