Li Wenhui, Zheng Ziting, Zeng Yuting, Zhou Zhiyan, Xiao Ping, Zhong Xincen, Yan Wenjuan
Department of Stomatology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 N Guangzhou RD, Guangzhou, PR, China.
Department of Stomatology, Longgang Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1489. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05217-2.
The optimal restoration protocol for endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a subject of debate. This survey aims to assess the current level of awareness, knowledge, and prevailing opinions among dental practitioners in China regarding the application of endocrown versus the post/core/crown ensemble for post-endodontic restoration strategies.
A validated questionnaire, encompassing three sections, was distributed electronically to dentists practicing in China. The initial section collected demographic characteristics of the participants, while the subsequent sections assessed their knowledge and preferences regarding ETT restoration techniques in various clinical scenarios. Distribution of the survey was facilitated through the social media platform WeChat, with a total of 600 invitations sent out. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistical Software, employing frequency and Chi-square tests to determine statistical significance at the P < 0.05 threshold.
A total of 400 valid questionnaires were collected. The amount of remaining tooth structure was identified as the most influential factor in determining the restoration strategies, contributing to 26.1%. Over 72.8% of the surveyed dentists acknowledged the reinforcing effect of intraradicular posts on ETT. More than half of the participants reported the application of endocrowns within their post-endodontics management. The preference for endocrowns was pronounced in cases where more than 50% of the tooth's structure remained or when occlusal space limitations were present. The Chi-Square test revealed that the participants' knowledge regarding endocrown restoration was significantly influenced by their age, educational background, and experience (p < 0.05).
The clinical decision-making process for the restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) by dental practitioners primarily relies on the amount of remaining tooth structure. Most surveyed dentists believe that the presence of a post can reinforce ETT. A majority of participants consider the Endocrown as a viable alternative restorative treatment for ETT.
根管治疗后牙齿(ETT)的最佳修复方案仍是一个有争议的话题。本调查旨在评估中国牙科从业者对采用嵌体冠修复与桩核冠修复进行根管治疗后修复策略的当前认知水平、知识掌握情况及普遍观点。
一份经过验证的包含三个部分的问卷通过电子方式分发给在中国执业的牙医。第一部分收集参与者的人口统计学特征,随后部分评估他们在各种临床场景下对ETT修复技术的知识和偏好。通过社交媒体平台微信协助进行调查分发,共发出600份邀请。使用SPSS统计软件进行数据分析,采用频率和卡方检验确定在P < 0.05阈值时的统计学显著性。
共收集到400份有效问卷。剩余牙体组织量被确定为决定修复策略的最具影响力因素,占比26.1%。超过72.8%的受访牙医认可根管内桩对ETT的增强作用。超过一半的参与者报告在其根管治疗后管理中应用了嵌体冠。在牙齿结构保留超过50%或存在咬合空间限制的情况下,对嵌体冠的偏好尤为明显。卡方检验显示,参与者对嵌体冠修复的知识受其年龄、教育背景和经验的显著影响(p < 0.05)。
牙科从业者对根管治疗后牙齿(ETT)进行修复的临床决策过程主要依赖于剩余牙体组织量。大多数受访牙医认为桩的存在可以增强ETT。大多数参与者认为嵌体冠是ETT一种可行的替代修复治疗方法。