Suppr超能文献

整体式牙髓冠与混合式根管内桩/核/冠修复用于根管治疗后的牙齿:横断面研究

Monolithic Endocrown Vs. Hybrid Intraradicular Post/Core/Crown Restorations for Endodontically Treated Teeth; Cross-sectional Study.

作者信息

Soliman Mai, Alshamrani Lamar, Yahya Basma, Alajlan Ghadah, Aldegheishem Alhanoof, Eldwakhly Elzahraa

机构信息

Clinical Dental Science Department, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.

College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Nov;28(11):6523-6531. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.07.020. Epub 2021 Jul 13.

Abstract

The gold standard for restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth (ETT) with successful clinical longevity requires having minimal invasive preparations and maximal tissue conservation. Many dentists still consider hybrid post/core/crown to be the first choice for restoring ETT. Endocrown is a viable alternative treatment modality to hybrid post/core/crown. This study aims to assess the proper judgment of dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the use of monolithic endocrown versus hybrid post/core/crown for restoring ETT. The IRB of Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University (PNU) Institutional Review Board reviewed this study. The questionnaire was validated and electronically distributed. The participants were pre-informed that their responses are completely anonymous and used for professional purposes only. The questionnaire surveyed dentists working in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, about their preference for different ETT restorative modalities at various clinical scenarios. Data were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and -test. All P-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 275 responses were collected; 61.45% were females and 38.55% males. 56% of them were general practitioners, while 16% were consultants. Prefabricated post/core was the most preferred technique among the participants (18.55%), followed by endocrown (12.36%), and lastly, cast post/core (8.73%). The amount of remaining tooth structure was the most influential in the treatment selection (30.18%), followed by the presence or absence of 1-2 mm ferrule (17.82%). Interocclusal space (12.36%) was the least influential factor. Endocrown recorded 63.27% as the most preferred line of treatment in case of insufficient inter-occlusal space. 40.36% preferred endocrown for patients with occlusal risk factors. The amount of the remaining tooth structure and the tooth position significantly affect the treatment options of the participants. Endocrown was the most preferred treatment modality for restoring ETT for patients with occlusal consideration.

摘要

成功实现临床长期寿命的牙髓治疗牙齿(ETT)修复的金标准要求进行微创预备并最大程度地保留组织。许多牙医仍将混合桩/核/冠视为修复ETT的首选。全瓷冠内冠是混合桩/核/冠的一种可行替代治疗方式。本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯利雅得的牙医对使用整体式全瓷冠内冠与混合桩/核/冠修复ETT的正确判断。努拉·宾特·阿卜杜勒拉赫曼公主大学(PNU)机构审查委员会的IRB审查了本研究。问卷经过验证并以电子方式分发。参与者事先被告知他们的回答将完全匿名且仅用于专业目的。该问卷调查了沙特阿拉伯利雅得的牙医在各种临床情况下对不同ETT修复方式的偏好。数据使用单因素方差分析和t检验进行分析。所有P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。共收集到275份回复;其中61.45%为女性,38.55%为男性。其中56%为全科医生,16%为顾问。预成桩/核是参与者中最受欢迎的技术(18.55%),其次是全瓷冠内冠(12.36%),最后是铸造桩/核(8.73%)。剩余牙体组织量对治疗选择的影响最大(30.18%),其次是是否存在1 - 2毫米肩台(17.82%)。咬合间隙(12.36%)是影响最小的因素。在咬合间隙不足的情况下,全瓷冠内冠记录为最受欢迎的治疗方式占63.27%。对于有咬合危险因素的患者,40.36%的人更喜欢全瓷冠内冠。剩余牙体组织量和牙齿位置显著影响参与者的治疗选择。对于有咬合考虑的患者来说,全瓷冠内冠是修复ETT最受欢迎的治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06f9/8568831/7ec723389020/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验