Boonpitak Kwanwong, Chailark Pichayaporn, Wisitset Warunnapa, Prawatvatchara Wisarut, Panpisut Piyaphong, Wongkamhaeng Kan
Division of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, 12120, Thailand.
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1496. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05301-7.
Marginal adaptation of the provisional restoration often requires relining from relining materials. This study determined the effects of surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) between 3D-printed provisional and bis-acryl relining materials.
The 3D-printed provisional specimens (9 × 9 × 2 mm) were prepared using methacrylate-based material. Five test groups (n = 15) based on surface treatments were evaluated; (1) no treatment (CT), (2) ethanol (ET), (3) universal adhesive; CLEARFIL TRI-S BOND Universal Quick (UA), (4) airborne-particle abrasion with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (AA), and (5) airborne-particle abrasion followed by universal adhesive (AA-UA). The specimens were bonded with relined bis-acryl resin material and left at room temperature for 24 h, allowing the complete polymerization. Then, shear bond strength was performed using a universal testing machine with a knife-edge blade parallel to the bonded surface at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure occurred. The fracture surfaces were examined under stereomicroscopy (20X) and scanning electron microscopy (50X).
The CT group had the lowest shear bond strength (1.92 ± 0.26 MPa), which was no statistically significant difference from ET (2.11 ± 0.23 MPa). The significantly highest shear bond strength was obtained from AA-UA (14.39 ± 1.07 MPa) (p < 0.05), followed by AA (6.39 ± 0.59 MPa) and UA (3.34 ± 0.21 MPa), respectively. Failure modes obtained were varied, with mixed and cohesive failures in AA-UA (46.6% mixed failures) and AA groups (66.6% mixed failure) whereas primarily adhesive failures were observed in CT (93.5%), ET (86.6%), and UA groups (86.6%).
Within the limitation of this study, the optimal bond strength was obtained when airborne-particle abrasion and universal adhesive were applied on the 3D-printed provisional material and relined with bis-acryl relining material.
临时修复体的边缘适应性通常需要使用重衬材料进行重衬。本研究确定了表面处理对3D打印临时修复体与双丙烯酸重衬材料之间剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。
使用基于甲基丙烯酸酯的材料制备3D打印临时修复体试件(9×9×2mm)。基于表面处理评估了五个测试组(n = 15);(1)未处理(CT),(2)乙醇(ET),(3)通用粘结剂;可乐丽三合一粘结剂通用快速型(UA),(4)用50μm氧化铝颗粒进行空气颗粒研磨(AA),以及(5)空气颗粒研磨后使用通用粘结剂(AA-UA)。将试件与重衬双丙烯酸树脂材料粘结,并在室温下放置24小时,使其完全聚合。然后,使用万能试验机,以1mm/min的十字头速度,用平行于粘结表面的刀口刀片进行剪切粘结强度测试,直至发生破坏。在体视显微镜(20倍)和扫描电子显微镜(50倍)下检查断裂表面。
CT组的剪切粘结强度最低(1.92±0.26MPa),与ET组(2.11±0.23MPa)无统计学显著差异。AA-UA组获得了显著最高的剪切粘结强度(14.39±1.07MPa)(p < 0.05),其次分别是AA组(6.39±0.59MPa)和UA组(3.34±0.21MPa)。获得的破坏模式各不相同,AA-UA组(46.6%混合破坏)和AA组(66.6%混合破坏)出现混合破坏和内聚破坏,而CT组(93.5%)、ET组(86.6%)和UA组(86.6%)主要出现粘结破坏。
在本研究的局限性内,当对3D打印临时修复体材料进行空气颗粒研磨并使用通用粘结剂,然后用双丙烯酸重衬材料进行重衬时,可获得最佳粘结强度。