Integrated lipidomics and RNA-seq reveal prognostic biomarkers in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is a mesenchymal malignant tumor characterized by different degrees of adipocytic differentiation. Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are two of the most common subtypes of RLPS, exhibiting clear differences in biological behaviors and clinical prognosis. The metabolic features and genomic characteristics remain unclear.

METHODS

This study employed lipidomic and RNA-seq analyses of RLPS tissues from 19 WDLPS and 29 DDLPS patients. Western blot and immunohistochemistry staining were performed to verify the tumor tissue protein levels of TIMP1, FN1, MMP11, GPNMB, and ECM1. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to evaluate different serum protein levels in 128 blood samples from patients with RLPS. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most crucial variables associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the RLPS patients.

RESULTS

Lipidomic analysis revealed a significant difference in lipid metabolism, particularly in phosphatidylcholines and triacylglycerides metabolism. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that 1,630 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were significantly enriched in lipid metabolism, developmental process, and extracellular matrix (ECM) pathways. Integrated lipidomic and transcriptomic analysis identified 29 genes as potential biomarkers between WDLPS and DDLPS. Among the 29 DEGs, we found that TIMP1, FN1, MMP11, GPNMB, and ECM1 were increased in DDLPS tumor tissues than in WDLPS tumor tissues. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed high specificity and sensitivity in diagnosing patients using a five-gene combination (AUC = 0.904). ELISA revealed a significant increase in the serum levels of ECM1 and GPNMB in patients with DDLPS compared to patients with WDLPS. ECM1 increased progressively across different FNCLCC Grades, correlating negatively with RFS (P = 0.043). GPNMB levels showed a negative correlation with OS (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals different lipid metabolism, several transcriptional pathways between WDLPS and DDLPS, and examines several serum markers associated with the prognosis of RLPS. These findings provide a vital basis for future endeavors in diagnosing and predicting the prognosis of retroperitoneal liposarcoma with different differentiations.