Suppr超能文献

基于MRI的VBQ和EBQ评分预测经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术(PILF)中椎间融合器下沉的对比分析。

Comparative analysis of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score for predicting cage subsidence in PILF surgery.

作者信息

Zhang Fan, Liang Jie, Shi Dawei, Tuo Can, Wu Yu, Yang Zijian

机构信息

The First College of Clinical Medical Science, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.

Yichang Central People's Hospital, Yichang, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05332-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As lumbar degenerative diseases become more prevalent in an aging population, there is an increasing demand for surgical interventions, such as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, cage subsidence (CS), observed in 23.9-54% of cases postoperatively, remains a significant complication. Several factors, including age, bone quality, and endplate damage, contribute to the risk of CS, with bone quality being among the most critical determinants. Although DEXA and QCT are widely employed to assess bone density, their routine use in preoperative evaluations is restricted by cost considerations and radiation exposure. Recent studies suggest that MRI-based vertebral body quality (VBQ) and endplate bone quality (EBQ) score offer a viable, non-invasive alternative for evaluating bone quality; however, there is limited research comparing their predictive value for CS.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 165 patients undergoing single-level PLIF surgery were included. MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score were calculated using T1-weighted images, and preoperative QCT was employed as a clinical standard. Cage subsidence was assessed based on postoperative imaging at 12-month follow-up. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, chi-square tests, and ROC curve analyses, were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of VBQ and EBQ for CS.

RESULTS

The study's findings demonstrated that both VBQ and EBQ scores were significantly correlated with QCT measurements, thereby validating their utility as indicators of bone quality. ROC analysis revealed that VBQ had superior predictive value for CS (AUC = 0.814) compared to EBQ (AUC = 0.719), with both scores demonstrating significant clinical utility in identifying patients at risk for CS. Notably, VBQ exhibited a stronger correlation with preoperative clinical outcomes compared to EBQ, underscoring its greater reliability as a predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the effectiveness of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score as practical, non-invasive tools for assessing bone quality preoperatively, with VBQ demonstrating superior predictive performance for CS risk. The findings underscore the potential of integrating these MRI-based assessments into routine preoperative planning to improve patient outcomes and minimize complications associated with PLIF surgery.

摘要

背景

随着腰椎退行性疾病在老龄化人群中愈发普遍,对诸如后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)等手术干预的需求日益增加。然而,术后23.9%-54%的病例中观察到的椎间融合器下沉(CS)仍是一个重大并发症。包括年龄、骨质和终板损伤在内的几个因素导致了CS的风险,其中骨质是最关键的决定因素之一。尽管双能X线吸收法(DEXA)和定量CT(QCT)被广泛用于评估骨密度,但由于成本考虑和辐射暴露,它们在术前评估中的常规使用受到限制。最近的研究表明,基于磁共振成像(MRI)的椎体质量(VBQ)和终板骨质量(EBQ)评分提供了一种可行的、非侵入性的评估骨质的替代方法;然而,比较它们对CS预测价值的研究有限。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了165例行单节段PLIF手术的患者。基于MRI的VBQ和EBQ评分使用T1加权图像计算,术前QCT用作临床标准。根据术后12个月随访时的影像学评估椎间融合器下沉情况。采用t检验、卡方检验和ROC曲线分析等统计分析方法来评估VBQ和EBQ对CS预测的准确性。

结果

该研究结果表明,VBQ和EBQ评分均与QCT测量值显著相关,从而验证了它们作为骨质指标的效用。ROC分析显示,与EBQ(AUC = 0.719)相比,VBQ对CS具有更高的预测价值(AUC = 0.814),两者在识别CS风险患者方面均具有显著的临床效用。值得注意的是,与EBQ相比,VBQ与术前临床结果的相关性更强,突出了其作为预测指标更高的可靠性。

结论

本研究强调了基于MRI的VBQ和EBQ评分作为术前评估骨质的实用、非侵入性工具的有效性,VBQ对CS风险显示出更高的预测性能。研究结果强调了将这些基于MRI的评估纳入常规术前规划以改善患者预后并将与PLIF手术相关的并发症降至最低的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84d9/11657832/6538507a23ca/13018_2024_5332_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验