• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的危险因素:一项Meta分析和系统评价

Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

作者信息

Shen Shufeng, You Xinmao, Ren Yingqing, Ye Senqi

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Yuyao People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Spinal Surgery, Yuyao People's Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.110. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.110
PMID:38145652
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the risk factors for cage subsidence (CS) after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).

METHODS

The cohort and case-control studies which reporting potential risk factors for CS following OLIF were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception to June 17, 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the literature according to the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RevMan5.3 software was used for Meta analysis. χ statistics and I statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity, and the analysis results were represented by forest plots.

RESULTS

A total of 8 studies with 280 cases of CS from 832 patients who underwent OLIF met the inclusion criteria. Elderly patients over 60 years old (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% CI 1.38-4.31, P = 0.002), osteoporosis (OR 4.18, 95% CI 2.30-7.61, P = 0.002), end plate injury (OR 5.72, 95% CI 2.32-14.11, P = 0.0002), and overdistraction of intervertebral space (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.3 2-2.11, P < 0.0001) were potential risk factors, while Hounsfield units value of the vertebral body (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-1.00, P = 0.02) is a protective factor. The number of operative segments did not increase the risk of CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, osteoporosis, endplate injury, and overdistraction of the intervertebral space may increase the risk of CS after OLIF. Although the incidence rate of CS is low, implementing effective preventions is a priority for clinicians based on these risk factors.

摘要

目的

本系统评价旨在评估斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)后椎间融合器下沉(CS)的危险因素。

方法

在PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库中检索自建库至2023年6月17日报道OLIF术后CS潜在危险因素的队列研究和病例对照研究。两名研究人员独立筛选文献、提取数据,并根据纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估文献质量。使用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。采用χ统计量和I统计量评估异质性,分析结果以森林图表示。

结果

共有8项研究符合纳入标准,涉及832例行OLIF手术患者中的280例CS病例。60岁以上老年患者(比值比[OR]2.44,95%可信区间[CI]1.38 - 4.31,P = 0.002)、骨质疏松症(OR 4.18,95%CI 2.30 - 7.61,P = 0.002)、终板损伤(OR 5.72,95%CI 2.32 - 14.11,P = 0.0002)和椎间间隙过度撑开(OR 1.67,95%CI 1.32 - 2.11,P < 0.0001)为潜在危险因素,而椎体的Hounsfield单位值(OR 0.97,95%CI 0.95 - 1.00,P = 0.02)为保护因素。手术节段数量并未增加CS的风险。

结论

年龄较大、骨质疏松症、终板损伤和椎间间隙过度撑开可能增加OLIF术后CS的风险。尽管CS的发生率较低,但基于这些危险因素实施有效的预防措施是临床医生的首要任务。

相似文献

1
Risk Factors of Cage Subsidence Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术后椎间融合器下沉的危险因素:一项Meta分析和系统评价
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.110. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
2
Clinical evaluation and finite element analysis of bone cement-augmented anterolateral screw fixation versus percutaneous bilateral pedicle screw fixation co-applied with oblique lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative diseases with osteoporosis.骨水泥增强前外侧螺钉固定与经皮双侧椎弓根螺钉固定联合斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗单节段骨质疏松性腰椎退变性疾病的临床评估及有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jun 10;13:1571849. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1571849. eCollection 2025.
3
Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.腰椎终板的几何和材料特性对腰椎椎间融合失败的影响:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Apr 10;17(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03091-8.
4
Modic Changes Increase the Cage Subsidence Rate in Spinal Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Modic 改变增加脊柱椎间融合术中 cage 沉降率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;181:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.10.080. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
5
Complications related to osteobiologics use in spine surgery: a systematic review.脊柱手术中与骨生物材料使用相关的并发症:系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Apr 20;35(9 Suppl):S86-104. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d81ef2.
6
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
7
Cost-effectiveness of open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (OTLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF): a systematic review and meta-analysis.开放式经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(OTLIF)与微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(MITLIF)的成本效益比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2021 Jun;21(6):945-954. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.018. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Neuromonitoring in Lateral Approaches for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.腰椎体间融合术侧方入路的神经监测:系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:268-277.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.031. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(TLIF)与后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)治疗腰椎滑脱症的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Spine J. 2017 Nov;17(11):1712-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review.外侧入路腰椎体间融合术期间主要和次要血管损伤的发生率:回顾性对比研究和系统文献复习。
Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Apr;45(2):1275-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
MRI based paraspinal muscle mass predicts early cage subsidence after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.基于磁共振成像的椎旁肌质量可预测腰椎后路椎间融合术后早期椎间融合器下沉。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27712. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13217-7.
2
An optimal disc height changes for successful indirect decompression with OLIF.成功进行斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)间接减压时,最佳椎间盘高度会发生变化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05562-4.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of oblique lateral interbody fusion with various fixation methods for degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a finite element analysis considering different bone densities.
不同固定方法下斜外侧椎间融合术治疗退变性腰椎侧凸的生物力学评估:一项考虑不同骨密度的有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 May 8;13:1562268. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1562268. eCollection 2025.
4
Selection of cage height in oblique lateral interbody fusion: is a cage height larger than the adjacent level disc too much?斜外侧椎间融合术中椎间融合器高度的选择:椎间融合器高度大于相邻节段椎间盘是否过高?
Eur Spine J. 2025 May;34(5):1919-1925. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08805-0. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
5
Preoperative CT attenuation value classification assesses cage subsidence risk in 112 OLIF surgery cases.术前CT衰减值分类评估112例OLIF手术病例中椎间融合器下沉风险。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 25;15(1):10276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94696-6.
6
The effects of cage on endplate collapse after stand-alone OLIF: based on finite element analysis and mechanics experiments.独立斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)后椎间融合器对终板塌陷的影响:基于有限元分析和力学实验
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Dec 10;12:1508385. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1508385. eCollection 2024.
7
Comparative analysis of MRI-based VBQ and EBQ score for predicting cage subsidence in PILF surgery.基于MRI的VBQ和EBQ评分预测经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术(PILF)中椎间融合器下沉的对比分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 19;19(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05332-4.
8
Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined With Anterolateral Fixation and Cement Augmentation for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases in the Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study.斜外侧腰椎椎间融合联合前外侧固定及骨水泥强化治疗老年退行性腰椎疾病:一项回顾性研究
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):446-459. doi: 10.1111/os.14315. Epub 2024 Dec 3.