• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过共享决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究:一项整群随机阶梯楔形试验的研究方案

The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial.

作者信息

Sepucha Karen, Elmariah Sammy, Valentine K D, Cavender Matthew A, Chang Yuchiao, Devireddy Chandan M, Dickert Neal W, Gama Kristy D, Knoepke Christopher E, Korngold Ethan, Kumbhani Dharam J, Matlock Daniel D, Messenger John C, Strong Susan, Thourani Vinod H, Nathan Ashwin, Quader Nishath, Brescia Alexander A

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6
PMID:39696639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11654330/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recommend shared decision-making (SDM) for patients with severe aortic stenosis choosing between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Although tools such as patient decision aids (DAs) and training in SDM have been shown to improve SDM, implementation of SDM and DAs is limited. The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) study aims to (1) determine the effectiveness of the interventions (a DA and clinician SDM training) in achieving SDM (primary outcome) and improving the quality of decisions about aortic valve replacement, (2) determine the reach of the DAs and adoption of training, and (3) explore potential mechanisms of effectiveness and implementation at the patient-, clinician-, and clinic-level.

METHODS

The study is a hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study using a cluster randomized batched stepped wedge trial with 8 sites across the USA. Eligible patients will be surveyed before and after visits with the heart valve team; clinicians will be surveyed after visits. Reach of DAs and adoption of training will be tracked. Clinicians will be interviewed regarding barriers and facilitators to implementation.

DISCUSSION

The IMPACT SDM Study seeks to provide evidence of the ability of the interventions to improve SDM and decision quality, and also to shed light on barriers and facilitators to SDM implementation to promote future implementation efforts.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737. Registered on December 15, 2023.

摘要

背景

美国心脏病学会、美国心脏协会以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心建议,对于患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者,在经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)和外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)之间进行选择时应采用共同决策(SDM)。尽管患者决策辅助工具(DAs)等工具以及共同决策培训已被证明可改善共同决策,但共同决策和决策辅助工具的实施仍然有限。通过共同决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者的治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究旨在:(1)确定干预措施(一种决策辅助工具和临床医生共同决策培训)在实现共同决策(主要结局)以及提高主动脉瓣置换决策质量方面的有效性;(2)确定决策辅助工具的普及程度和培训的采用情况;(3)探索在患者、临床医生和诊所层面有效性和实施的潜在机制。

方法

该研究是一项II型混合有效性 - 实施研究,采用整群随机分批阶梯楔形试验,在美国各地有8个研究点。符合条件的患者在与心脏瓣膜团队就诊前后将接受调查;临床医生在就诊后将接受调查。将跟踪决策辅助工具的普及程度和培训的采用情况。将就实施的障碍和促进因素对临床医生进行访谈。

讨论

IMPACT SDM研究旨在提供证据,证明干预措施改善共同决策和决策质量的能力,并阐明共同决策实施的障碍和促进因素,以推动未来的实施工作。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06171737。于2023年12月15日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/586ebb183a45/13063_2024_8640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/ee6461b972f2/13063_2024_8640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/568e9cf094d6/13063_2024_8640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/586ebb183a45/13063_2024_8640_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/ee6461b972f2/13063_2024_8640_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/568e9cf094d6/13063_2024_8640_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa5c/11654330/586ebb183a45/13063_2024_8640_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The IMproving treatment decisions for Patients with AortiC stenosis Through Shared Decision Making (IMPACT SDM) Study: study protocol for a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial.通过共享决策改善主动脉瓣狭窄患者治疗决策(IMPACT SDM)研究:一项整群随机阶梯楔形试验的研究方案
Trials. 2024 Dec 18;25(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08640-6.
2
The Learning Curve for Shared Decision-making in Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis.症状性主动脉瓣狭窄的共享决策学习曲线。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;5(4):442-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5719.
3
Experiences Implementing a Suite of Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Qualitative Insights From the DECIDE-ICD Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器决策辅助工具套件的实施经验:来自 DECIDE-ICD 试验的定性见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Nov;15(11):e009352. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009352. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e054222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054222.
5
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
6
Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transcatheter heart valve replacement in female patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve intervention (Randomized researcH in womEn all comers wIth Aortic stenosis [RHEIA] trial).背景与设计:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、多中心研究,旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术在需要主动脉瓣干预的严重症状性主动脉瓣狭窄女性患者中的安全性和疗效(随机研究在所有适合接受主动脉瓣狭窄介入治疗的女性患者中[RHEIA 试验])。
Am Heart J. 2020 Oct;228:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Two-Year Outcomes in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Randomized to Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: The All-Comers Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention Randomized Clinical Trial.重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者随机接受经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的两年结果:全人群北欧主动脉瓣干预随机临床试验
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003665.
8
A multicenter trial of a shared DECision Support Intervention for Patients offered implantable Cardioverter-DEfibrillators: DECIDE-ICD rationale, design, Medicare changes, and pilot data.一项针对接受植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的共享决策支持干预的多中心试验:DECIDE-ICD 的原理、设计、医疗保险变化和试点数据。
Am Heart J. 2020 Aug;226:161-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
9
Decision-Making Approach to the Treatment of Young and Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.主动脉瓣狭窄的年轻低危患者治疗决策方法。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Nov 11;17(21):2455-2471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.08.032.
10
Professionals' views on shared decision-making in severe aortic stenosis.专业人士对重度主动脉瓣狭窄共同决策的看法。
Heart. 2022 Apr;108(7):558-564. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320194. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Design of a dual randomized trial in a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.在 2 型混合有效性-实施研究中设计一项双重随机试验。
Implement Sci. 2023 Nov 23;18(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01317-9.
2
Experiences Implementing a Suite of Decision Aids for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Qualitative Insights From the DECIDE-ICD Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器决策辅助工具套件的实施经验:来自 DECIDE-ICD 试验的定性见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 Nov;15(11):e009352. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.122.009352. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
3
The batched stepped wedge design: A design robust to delays in cluster recruitment.
成批分步楔形设计:一种针对群组招募延迟稳健的设计。
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3627-3641. doi: 10.1002/sim.9438. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Development and piloting of four decision aids for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in different media formats.开发并试用了四种不同媒体格式的植入式心脏除颤器决策辅助工具。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Nov;44(11):1842-1852. doi: 10.1111/pace.14365. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
Development and Evaluation of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: A Short Patient-Reported Measure.共享决策过程量表的制定与评估:一种简短的患者报告测量工具
Med Decis Making. 2021 Feb;41(2):108-119. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977878. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects.实施研究逻辑模型:一种用于规划、执行、报告和综合实施项目的方法。
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 25;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01041-8.
7
Decision Aid Implementation among Left Ventricular Assist Device Programs Participating in the DECIDE-LVAD Stepped-Wedge Trial.参与 DECIDE-LVAD 阶梯式试验的左心室辅助装置项目中的决策辅助工具实施。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):289-301. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20915227.
8
Shared decision making in older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a systematic review.老年有症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的共同决策:系统评价。
Heart. 2020 May;106(9):647-655. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316055. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Investigation of factors influencing the implementation of two shared decision-making interventions in contraceptive care: a qualitative interview study among clinical and administrative staff.调查影响避孕护理中两种共享决策干预措施实施的因素:一项针对临床和行政人员的定性访谈研究。
Implement Sci. 2019 Nov 9;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0941-z.
10
Racial Disparities in the Utilization and Outcomes of TAVR: TVT Registry Report.种族差异在 TAVR 的利用和结局中的表现:TVT 注册研究报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):936-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.007.