• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将卡尔加里审计与反馈框架扩展到虚拟环境:一项过程评估和实证证据

Extending the Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework into the virtual environment: a process evaluation and empiric evidence.

作者信息

Woodhouse Douglas, Duncan Diane, Ferrie Leah, Omodon Onyebuchi, Mehta Ashi, Pokharel Surakshya, Ambasta Anshula

机构信息

Physician Learning Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Dec 18;5(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00679-5.

DOI:10.1186/s43058-024-00679-5
PMID:39696726
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework (CAFF) is a pragmatic, evidence-based approach for the design and implementation of in-person social learning interventions using Audit and Group Feedback (AGF). This report describes extension of CAFF into the virtual environment as part of a multifaceted intervention bundle to reduce redundant daily laboratory testing in hospitals. We evaluate the process of extending CAFF in the virtual environment and share resulting evidence of participant engagement with planning for practice change.

METHODS

We describe an innovative virtually facilitated AGF intervention based on the CAFF. The AGF intervention was part of an intervention bundle which included individual physician laboratory test utilization reports and educational tools to reduce redundant daily laboratory testing in hospitals. We used data from recorded and transcribed virtual AGF sessions, post AGF session surveys and detailed field notes maintained by project team members. We used simple descriptive statistics for quantitative data and analyzed qualitative data according to the elements of CAFF.

RESULTS

Eighty-three physicians participated over twelve virtual AGF sessions conducted across four tertiary care hospitals during the study period. We demonstrate that all prerequisite activities for CAFF (relationship building, question choice and data representation) were present in every virtual AGF session. Virtual facilitation was effective in supporting the transition of participants through different steps of CAFF in each session to lead to change talk and planning. All participants contributed to discussion during the AGF sessions. The post AGF session surveys were filled by 66% of participants (55/83), with over 90% of respondents reporting that the session helped them improve practice. 46% of participants (38/83) completed personal commitment to change forms at the end of the sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual AGF sessions, developed and implemented with fidelity to the CAFF approach, successfully engaged physicians in a group learning environment that led to change planning. Further studies are needed to determine the generalizability of our findings and to add to the literature on evidence-based virtual facilitation techniques.

摘要

背景

卡尔加里审核与反馈框架(CAFF)是一种实用的、基于证据的方法,用于设计和实施使用审核与小组反馈(AGF)的面对面社交学习干预措施。本报告描述了将CAFF扩展到虚拟环境中,作为减少医院日常重复实验室检测的多方面干预措施组合的一部分。我们评估了在虚拟环境中扩展CAFF的过程,并分享了参与者参与实践变革规划的相关证据。

方法

我们描述了一种基于CAFF的创新型虚拟促进AGF干预措施。AGF干预是干预措施组合的一部分,该组合包括个体医生实验室检测使用报告和教育工具,以减少医院日常重复实验室检测。我们使用了虚拟AGF会议的录音和转录数据、AGF会议后调查以及项目团队成员记录的详细现场笔记。我们对定量数据使用简单描述性统计,并根据CAFF的要素分析定性数据。

结果

在研究期间,83名医生参加了在四家三级护理医院进行的12次虚拟AGF会议。我们证明,CAFF的所有前提活动(建立关系、问题选择和数据呈现)在每次虚拟AGF会议中都存在。虚拟促进有效地支持了参与者在每次会议中通过CAFF的不同步骤进行过渡,以促成改变谈话和规划。所有参与者都在AGF会议期间参与了讨论。66%的参与者(55/83)填写了AGF会议后调查问卷,超过90%的受访者表示该会议帮助他们改进了实践。46%的参与者(38/83)在会议结束时填写了个人变革承诺表。

结论

按照CAFF方法忠实开发和实施的虚拟AGF会议,成功地让医生参与到一个导致变革规划的小组学习环境中。需要进一步研究以确定我们研究结果的普遍性,并补充基于证据的虚拟促进技术方面的文献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/3d70105b1345/43058_2024_679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/cbb6a9a671e3/43058_2024_679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/ce58b8139a33/43058_2024_679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/3d70105b1345/43058_2024_679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/cbb6a9a671e3/43058_2024_679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/ce58b8139a33/43058_2024_679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4313/11657922/3d70105b1345/43058_2024_679_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Extending the Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework into the virtual environment: a process evaluation and empiric evidence.将卡尔加里审计与反馈框架扩展到虚拟环境:一项过程评估和实证证据
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Dec 18;5(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00679-5.
2
The Calgary Audit and Feedback Framework: a practical, evidence-informed approach for the design and implementation of socially constructed learning interventions using audit and group feedback.卡尔加里审核与反馈框架:一种实用的、以证据为基础的方法,用于设计和实施使用审核和小组反馈的社会建构学习干预措施。
Implement Sci. 2018 Oct 30;13(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0829-3.
3
How do physicians behave when they participate in audit and feedback activities in a group with their peers?当医生们在与同行组成的小组中参与审核和反馈活动时,他们的行为表现如何?
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 31;13(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0796-8.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Audit and group feedback in nursing home physician groups: lessons learned from a qualitative study.养老院医生团队中的审计与集体反馈:定性研究的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12355-y.
6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
7
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
8
Actively Teaching Active Teaching Techniques.积极教授主动教学技巧。
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 31;9(4):SG1-SG12. doi: 10.21980/J8H94V. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Innovative Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Nerve Block Model for Training Emergency Medicine Physicians.用于培训急诊医学医师的创新型超声引导竖脊肌平面神经阻滞模型
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 30;10(2):I1-I10. doi: 10.21980/J8PW7D. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Development and implementation of a clinician report to reduce unnecessary urine drug screen testing in the ED: a quality improvement initiative.开发和实施临床医生报告以减少 ED 中不必要的尿液药物筛查检测:一项质量改进计划。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jun;39(6):471-478. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210009. Epub 2021 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual facilitation best practices and research priorities: a scoping review.虚拟辅助的最佳实践与研究重点:一项范围综述
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Feb 16;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00551-6.
2
Designing a Behaviour Change Wheel guided implementation strategy for a hypoxaemic respiratory failure and ARDS care pathway that targets barriers.针对低氧性呼吸衰竭和 ARDS 护理路径中的障碍,设计一个受行为变化轮指导的实施策略。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Dec 30;12(4):e002461. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002461.
3
Sustainability, spread, and scale in trials using audit and feedback: a theory-informed, secondary analysis of a systematic review.
使用审核和反馈进行试验的可持续性、传播和规模:对系统评价的理论启发式二次分析。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 26;18(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01312-0.
4
Repurposing the Ordering of Routine Laboratory Tests in Hospitalised Medical Patients (RePORT): results of a cluster randomised stepped-wedge quality improvement study.再利用住院医疗患者常规实验室检测的医嘱(ordering)(RePORT):一项群组随机化阶梯式质量改进研究的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Sep;32(9):517-525. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015611. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Interventions to reduce repetitive ordering of low-value inpatient laboratory tests: a systematic review.干预措施以减少低价值住院患者实验室检验的重复开具:系统评价。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Mar;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002128.
6
Nudge interventions to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in primary care: a systematic review.推动干预措施减少初级保健中不必要的抗生素处方:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 18;13(1):e062688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062688.
7
The effectiveness of a multifaceted, group-facilitated audit and feedback intervention to increase tranexamic acid use during total joint arthroplasty.多方面、小组式审核及反馈干预措施对增加全膝关节置换术中氨甲环酸使用的效果。
Can J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;69(9):1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02236-x. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
Development and Evaluation of an Audit and Feedback Process for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury During Coronary Angiography and Intervention.冠状动脉造影和介入治疗期间预防急性肾损伤的审核与反馈流程的开发与评估
CJC Open. 2021 Oct 23;4(3):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.10.006. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Implementation and Evaluation of Audit and Feedback for Monitoring Treat-to-Target (T2T) Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Performance Measures.使用性能指标对类风湿关节炎治疗达标(T2T)策略进行监测的审核与反馈的实施及评估
Rheumatol Ther. 2020 Dec;7(4):909-925. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00237-0. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
10
Group-facilitated audit and feedback to improve bronchiolitis care in the emergency department.小组协助审核和反馈以改善急诊科毛细支气管炎的护理。
CJEM. 2020 Sep;22(5):678-686. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.374.