Zhao Ruru, Liu Yuanbo, Huang Yihong, Gao Hanming, Huang Debin
Second 2 of Critical Care Department, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Cenxi People's Hospital, Wuzhou 543200, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. Corresponding author: Huang Debin, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Nov;36(11):1157-1162. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231107-00950.
To compare the application effects of three different extubation techniques in patients with mechanical ventilation in intensive care unit (ICU).
A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. Mechanical ventilation patients admitted to the critical care department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from July to November 2023 were enrolled. According to the random number table generated by Excel, the patients were divided into negative pressure group, positive pressure group 1 and positive pressure group 2, with 45 cases in each group. On the basis of routine nursing, the negative pressure group used the negative pressure extubation technique to remove the tracheal catheter. In the positive pressure group, the pressure support (PS) and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of the positive pressure group 1 were 7 cmHO (1 cmHO≈0.098 kPa) and 5 cmHO, and the PS and PEEP of the positive pressure group 2 were 15 cmHO and 10 cmHO. The main outcome measures were extubation related complications, including tachypnea, severe cough, sore throat, upper airway obstruction spasm, extubation failure, hypoxemia, and hypercapnia. The secondary outcome measures were the variation of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and blood oxygen saturation before and 1, 15 and 30 minutes after extubation.
Finally, 42 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, catheter retention days, duration of mechanical ventilation, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), catheter model and diagnosis among the three groups, which were comparable. There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of tachypnea, severe cough, sore throat, upper airway obstruction spasm, hypoxemia and hypercapnia among the three groups, while there was no statistically significant difference in the failure rate of extubation. The incidence of tachypnea, severe cough, sore throat, upper airway obstruction spasm, hypoxemia and hypercapnia after extubation in positive pressure group 1 and positive pressure group 2 were lower than those in negative pressure group (7.14%, 9.52% vs. 33.33%; 7.14%, 4.76% vs. 28.57%; 61.90%, 52.38% vs. 88.10%; 11.90%, 19.05% vs. 45.24%; 7.14%, 7.14% vs. 30.95%; 4.76%, 2.38% vs. 28.57%; all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in extubation related complications between group 1 and group 2. There were significant differences in the time effect of heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and blood oxygen saturation 30 minutes after extubation among three groups (F values were 145.792, 49.749, 22.486, 23.622 and 242.664, respectively, all P < 0.01). The intergroup effect of blood oxygen saturation was statistically significant (F = 3.835, P = 0.024), and the blood oxygen saturation in positive pressure group 1 and positive pressure group 2 were higher than those in negative pressure group 1 minute and 30 minutes after extubation (1 minute after extubation: 0.97±0.02, 0.97±0.02 vs. 0.95±0.02; 30 minutes after extubation: 1.00±0.01, 1.00±0.01 vs. 0.99±0.02, all P < 0.05). The interaction effects of heart rate and blood oxygen saturation were statistically significant (F values were 3.512 and 7.226, respectively, both P < 0.01).
Compared with negative pressure extubation, positive pressure extubation can effectively reduce extubation related complications in ICU mechanically ventilated patients. It is beneficial to maintain stable blood oxygen saturation within 30 minutes after extubation, and has better clinical application effects. It is recommended to use low pressure extubation.
比较三种不同拔管技术在重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气患者中的应用效果。
进行一项前瞻性随机对照研究。纳入2023年7月至11月在广西医科大学第一附属医院重症医学科住院的机械通气患者。根据Excel生成的随机数字表,将患者分为负压组、正压组1和正压组2,每组45例。在常规护理基础上,负压组采用负压拔管技术拔除气管导管。正压组中,正压组1的压力支持(PS)和呼气末正压(PEEP)分别为7 cmH₂O(1 cmH₂O≈0.098 kPa)和5 cmH₂O,正压组2的PS和PEEP分别为15 cmH₂O和10 cmH₂O。主要观察指标为拔管相关并发症,包括呼吸急促、剧烈咳嗽、咽痛、上气道梗阻痉挛、拔管失败、低氧血症和高碳酸血症。次要观察指标为拔管前及拔管后1、15和30分钟心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压和血氧饱和度的变化。
最终每组纳入42例患者。三组患者在性别、年龄、导管留置天数、机械通气时间、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、导管型号及诊断方面差异无统计学意义,具有可比性。三组患者在呼吸急促、剧烈咳嗽、咽痛、上气道梗阻痉挛、低氧血症和高碳酸血症的发生率方面差异有统计学意义,而拔管失败率差异无统计学意义。正压组1和正压组2拔管后呼吸急促、剧烈咳嗽、咽痛、上气道梗阻痉挛、低氧血症和高碳酸血症的发生率均低于负压组(7.14%,9.52% 对33.33%;7.14%,4.76% 对28.57%;61.90%,52.38% 对88.10%;11.90%,19.05% 对45.24%;7.14%,7.14% 对30.95%;4.76%,2.38% 对28.57%;均P < 0.05)。组1和组2之间拔管相关并发症差异无统计学意义。三组患者拔管后30分钟心率、收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压和血氧饱和度的时间效应差异有统计学意义(F值分别为145.792、49.749、22.486、23.622和242.664,均P < 0.01)。血氧饱和度的组间效应差异有统计学意义(F = 3.835,P = 0.024),正压组1和正压组2在拔管后1分钟和30分钟的血氧饱和度高于负压组(拔管后1分钟:0.97±0.02,0.97±0.02对0.95±0.02;拔管后30分钟:1.00±0.01,1.00±0.01对0.99±0.02,均P < 0.05)。心率和血氧饱和度的交互效应差异有统计学意义(F值分别为3.512和7.226,均P < 0.01)。
与负压拔管相比,正压拔管可有效降低ICU机械通气患者的拔管相关并发症。有利于拔管后30分钟内维持稳定的血氧饱和度,具有较好的临床应用效果。推荐采用低压拔管。