van Gurp Margo, Alba Sandra, Ammiwala Maida, Arab Sayed Rahim, Sadaat Sayed Murtaza, Hanifi Fazelrabie, Safi Sohrab, Ansari Nasratullah, Campos-Ponce Maiza, Kok Maarten Olivier
Health, KIT Royal Tropical Institute, Mauritskade 64, Amsterdam 1092 AD, The Netherlands.
Particip, Kabul, Afghanistan.
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Mar 7;40(3):368-379. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae121.
During the past two decades, the Afghan government, along with the international community, has developed a system aimed at improving access to essential healthcare services under Afghanistan's challenging sociopolitical and geographical circumstances. In 31 provinces, nonstate actors competed for fixed-term contracts to implement a predefined package of healthcare services. In three provinces, the government organized the provision of healthcare services. An independent third party monitored service provision, including access to medicines. This study examines the availability of essential medicines in Afghanistan's public healthcare facilities and how this is shaped by sociopolitical challenges, geographical barriers, and the organization of the healthcare system. Between March and July 2021, enumerators collected data at 885 healthcare facilities across Afghanistan. For our analysis, we combined data on medicine availability and the functioning of the health system with publicly available information about geographical and sociopolitical factors, including security incidents. Using regression analysis, we identified facility-, district-, and provincial-level factors related to medicine availability in public healthcare facilities. On average, 70% of 31 selected essential medicines were available in 2021. The availability of medicines varied significantly between provinces and was considerably higher in those where services were contracted out to nonstate actors (n = 31; 91%) compared to provinces where service provision was organized by the government (n = 3; 9%). The most important drivers of variation in medicine availability included geographical barriers, securing and allocating funds at the provincial level, and organizing and sustaining physical capacity at the facility level. Insecurity was not a key factor driving variation in medicine availability. Despite the sociopolitical challenges in 2021, the availability of essential medicines in public healthcare facilities was relatively high. The results suggest that decentralized procurement of medicines by nonstate actors and timely payment of funds contribute to medicine availability. Strategies to improve medicine availability should target hard-to-reach areas and lower-level facilities.
在过去二十年里,阿富汗政府与国际社会一道,在阿富汗充满挑战的社会政治和地理环境下,建立了一个旨在改善基本医疗服务可及性的体系。在31个省份,非国家行为体竞争定期合同以实施预先确定的一揽子医疗服务。在三个省份,由政府组织提供医疗服务。一个独立的第三方监测服务提供情况,包括药品供应情况。本研究考察了阿富汗公共医疗机构基本药品的可及性,以及社会政治挑战、地理障碍和医疗体系组织形式如何影响这一可及性。2021年3月至7月期间,调查员在阿富汗各地的885个医疗机构收集了数据。在分析中,我们将药品可及性数据和卫生系统运行情况与地理和社会政治因素(包括安全事件)的公开信息相结合。通过回归分析,我们确定了与公共医疗机构药品可及性相关的机构、地区和省级因素。2021年,31种选定基本药品的平均可及率为70%。各省之间药品可及性差异显著,与由政府组织提供服务的省份(n = 3;9%)相比,将服务外包给非国家行为体的省份(n = 31;91%)的药品可及性要高得多。药品可及性差异的最重要驱动因素包括地理障碍、省级资金的保障和分配,以及机构层面的能力建设和维持。不安全并非导致药品可及性差异的关键因素。尽管2021年存在社会政治挑战,但公共医疗机构基本药品的可及性相对较高。结果表明,非国家行为体分散采购药品以及及时支付资金有助于药品可及性。提高药品可及性的策略应针对难以到达的地区和基层医疗机构。