Read Robert W, Schlauch Karen A, Elhanan Gai, Neveux Iva, Koning Stephanie, Cooper Takesha, Grzymski Joseph J
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Department of Health Behavior, Policy, and Administrative Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;12:1447008. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1447008. eCollection 2024.
As complex mental health traits and life histories are often poorly captured in hospital systems, the utility of using the Barratt Impulsivity Scale (BIS) and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) for assessing adult disease risks is unknown. Here, we use participants from the Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) to determine if two standard self-assessments could predict the incidence and onset of disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving adult participants who completed the Behavioral and Mental Health Self-Assessment (HDSA) between September 2018 and March 2024. Impulsivity levels were measured using the BIS-15, and retrospective self-reports of ACEs were collected through a standardized questionnaire. In total, 17,482 HNP participants completed the HDSA. Our findings indicate that ACEs were significantly associated with impulsivity. Disease associations with impulsivity and ACEs were evaluated using a phenome-wide association study, identifying 230 significant associations with impulsivity. Among these, 44 were related to mental health diagnoses, including major depressive disorder (MDD). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates characterized the differences in the lifetime predicted probability between high and low impulsivity for major depressive disorder and essential hypertension. This analysis showed that having both high ACEs and high impulsivity confer substantial risk of MDD diagnosis (hazard ratios 2.81, 2.17, respectively). Additionally, lifetime predicted probability of MDD was approximately 40% higher for high ACEs and high impulsivity compared to no ACEs and low impulsivity. Essential hypertension demonstrated similar trends, with an approximate 20% increase in predicted lifetime probability of diagnosis. These results demonstrate that high ACES and elevated impulsivity scores are associated with a range of negative health outcomes and a simple self-assessment of complex traits and life history may significantly impact clinical risk assessments.
由于医院系统往往难以全面捕捉复杂的心理健康特征和生活经历,因此,使用巴拉特冲动量表(BIS)和童年不良经历(ACEs)来评估成人疾病风险的效用尚不清楚。在此,我们利用内华达健康项目(HNP)的参与者来确定两项标准的自我评估是否能够预测疾病的发病率和发病情况。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2018年9月至2024年3月期间完成行为和心理健康自我评估(HDSA)的成年参与者。使用BIS-15测量冲动水平,并通过标准化问卷收集ACEs的回顾性自我报告。共有17482名HNP参与者完成了HDSA。我们的研究结果表明,ACEs与冲动性显著相关。使用全表型关联研究评估了冲动性和ACEs与疾病的关联,确定了230个与冲动性显著相关的因素。其中,44个与心理健康诊断有关,包括重度抑郁症(MDD)。卡普兰-迈耶生存估计描述了重度抑郁症和原发性高血压高冲动性和低冲动性之间终生预测概率的差异。该分析表明,高ACEs和高冲动性都会带来较高的MDD诊断风险(风险比分别为2.81和2.17)。此外,与无ACEs和低冲动性相比,高ACEs和高冲动性的MDD终生预测概率高出约40%。原发性高血压也表现出类似趋势,诊断的预测终生概率增加了约20%。这些结果表明,高ACEs和高冲动性得分与一系列负面健康结果相关,对复杂特征和生活史进行简单的自我评估可能会显著影响临床风险评估。