Du Xin, Luo Xingxian, Guo Qixiang, Jiang Xiaomeng, Su Ziling, Zhou Weiting, Wang Zhongjian, Li Jiarun, Yang Yue, Zhang Yi
Vanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;12:1476213. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1476213. eCollection 2024.
As China is one of the countries with the highest recorded cases of Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases (IMIDs), these diseases have also emerged as a serious public health concern. Biosimilars, potentially lower-cost versions of biologics, may improve access to more affordable yet comparably effective treatments. Encouragingly, China launched its abbreviated biosimilar pathway in 2015, and since then, a large number of biosimilars have been approved. However, systematic studies on the therapeutic efficacy and economic impact of IMIDs biosimilars are lacking in China. This study aims to assess the clinical benefits (including efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity), cost and uptake of adalimumab biosimilars, tocilizumab biosimilars, and infliximab biosimilars compared with their reference biologics in patients with IMIDs in China.
IMIDs biosimilars and their reference drugs approved in China between 2015 and 2024 were identified. Head-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and real-world cohort studies on adalimumab, tocilizumab and infliximab and their biosimilars for the treatment of IMIDs were assessed. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Listed Drug Database of China National Medical Products Administration were searched for clinical trials and cohort studies on biosimilars for IMIDs from their inception to November 1, 2024. We evaluated the monthly treatment costs and quarterly uptakes of these biosimilars and their reference biologics in China. Besides, we simulated the impact of biosimilar substitution in different scenarios. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of treatments, including pooled risk ratios (RR) for ACR20 for rheumatoid arthritis, ASAS20 for ankylosing spondylitis, and PASI for plaque psoriasis, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), and neutralizing antibodies (Nabs), with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).
A total of 12 RCTs involving 5,717 patients with IMIDs were analyzed, including 12 approved biosimilars of adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab. The primary endpoints of adalimumab (7 RCTs with 3,174 patients; RR, 1.02; 95% CrI, 0.99-1.06, = 0.33), infliximab (3 RCTs with 1,291 patients; RR, 1.02; 95% CrI, 0.94-1.11, = 0.98), tocilizumab (2 RCTs with 1,252 patients; RR, 1.01, 95% CrI, 0.94-1.08) met equivalence with reference biologics. Additionally, there was no significant difference between biosimilars and their reference biologics in the secondary endpoints. Overall, biosimilars demonstrated comparable safety (TEAEs: RR, 0.99; 95% CrI, 0.95-1.02, = 0.44) (SAEs: RR, 0.80; 95% CrI, 0.42-1.54, = 0.50) and immunogenicity (ADA: RR, 1.00; 95% CrI, 0.95-1.04, = 0.85) (Nabs: RR, 0.93; 95% CrI, 0.82-1.05, = 0.25) profiles to reference biologics. These findings were consistent with the cohort studies. In 2024, IMIDs biosimilars are available at 63 to 82% of the price per unit of the reference drugs, with uptake rates of 16.5 to 72.1% in China. Patients with IMIDs using these biosimilars could save between $874 and $2,184 per month in treatment costs, equivalent to 1.8 to 7.0 times the monthly disposable income in China in 2024. Simulation showed that with 100% biosimilar substitution, savings would increase to $22.98 M, $33.83 M, and $3.82 M for adalimumab, infliximab, and tocilizumab, respectively. This would enable treatment for an additional 6,700, 9,863, and 4,373 patients, respectively.
Our study revealed that IMID biosimilars in China provide clinical benefits comparable to their reference biologics evidenced by high-quality RCTs and cohort studies with offer significant cost savings in China. Encouraging China's national volume-based procurement and multi-stakeholder collaboration may help accelerate the substitution of IMIDs biosimilars.
中国是免疫介导性炎症疾病(IMIDs)病例记录数最高的国家之一,这些疾病也已成为严重的公共卫生问题。生物类似药是生物制品的潜在低成本版本,可能会改善人们获得更实惠且疗效相当的治疗方法的机会。令人鼓舞的是,中国于2015年推出了简化的生物类似药审批途径,自那时以来,大量生物类似药已获批准。然而,中国缺乏对IMIDs生物类似药的治疗效果和经济影响的系统性研究。本研究旨在评估阿达木单抗生物类似药、托珠单抗生物类似药和英夫利昔单抗生物类似药与它们的原研生物制品相比,在中国IMIDs患者中的临床益处(包括疗效/有效性、安全性和免疫原性)、成本及使用情况。
确定了2015年至2024年在中国获批的IMIDs生物类似药及其原研药物。评估了关于阿达木单抗、托珠单抗和英夫利昔单抗及其生物类似药治疗IMIDs的头对头随机临床试验(RCT)和真实世界队列研究。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Clinicaltrials.gov以及中国国家药品监督管理局药品审评中心药品审评数据库,以获取从开始到2024年11月1日关于IMIDs生物类似药的临床试验和队列研究。我们评估了这些生物类似药及其原研生物制品在中国的每月治疗成本和季度使用情况。此外,我们模拟了不同情景下生物类似药替代的影响。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以评估治疗的疗效、安全性和免疫原性,包括类风湿关节炎的美国风湿病学会20%改善标准(ACR20)、强直性脊柱炎的脊柱关节炎国际学会20%改善标准(ASAS20)和斑块状银屑病的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)的合并风险比(RR)、治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)、严重不良事件(SAE)、抗药抗体(ADA)和中和抗体(Nab),并给出95%可信区间(CrI)。
共分析了12项涉及5717例IMIDs患者的RCT,包括12种获批的阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和托珠单抗生物类似药。阿达木单抗(7项RCT,3174例患者;RR,1.02;95% CrI,0.99 - 1.06,P = 0.33)、英夫利昔单抗(3项RCT,1291例患者;RR,1.02;95% CrI,0.94 - 1.11,P = 0.98)、托珠单抗(2项RCT,1252例患者;RR,1.01,95% CrI,0.94 - 1.08)的主要终点与原研生物制品等效。此外,生物类似药与其原研生物制品在次要终点上无显著差异。总体而言,生物类似药在安全性(TEAE:RR,0.99;95% CrI,0.95 - 1.02,P = 0.44)(SAE:RR,0.80;95% CrI,0.42 - 1.54,P = 0.50)和免疫原性(ADA:RR,1.00;95% CrI,0.95 - 1.04,P = 0.85)(Nab:RR,0.93;95% CrI,0.82 - 1.05,P = 0.25)方面与原研生物制品相当。这些发现与队列研究一致。2024年,IMIDs生物类似药的单位价格为原研药物的63%至82%,在中国的使用率为16.5%至72.1%。使用这些生物类似药的IMIDs患者每月可节省874美元至2184美元的治疗成本,相当于2024年中国月可支配收入的1.8倍至7.0倍。模拟显示,若100%使用生物类似药替代,阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和托珠单抗分别可节省2298万美元、3383万美元和382万美元。这将分别使另外6700例、9863例和4373例患者能够接受治疗。
我们的研究表明,中国的IMID生物类似药提供了与原研生物制品相当的临床益处,高质量的RCT和队列研究证明了这一点,并且在中国可显著节省成本。鼓励中国的国家集中带量采购和多利益相关方合作可能有助于加速IMIDs生物类似药的替代。