Suppr超能文献

门诊有症状的COVID-19患者的一级血栓预防:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory symptomatic patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Di Vece Davide, Valgimigli Marco, Barnathan Elliot, Connors Jean M, Cools Frank, Held Ulrike, Kakkar Ajay K, Piazza Gregory, Spirk David, Virdone Saverio, Kucher Nils, Barco Stefano

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

First Clinic of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Oct 29;8(8):102613. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102613. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the search for strategies to improve outcomes in affected individuals, including those initially managed in outpatient settings. Thromboembolic events have been reported as a concerning complication.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of primary thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022362776).

METHODS

The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and OVID/Embase and CENTRAL from Cochrane for studies up to December 11, 2023, without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with placebo or standard of care in symptomatic outpatients with COVID-19 were included in this analysis. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause hospitalization and death within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included venous thromboembolism, the composite of venous thromboembolism and major arterial cardiovascular events, and the individual components of the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Seven randomized controlled trials and 3758 COVID-19 outpatients were included. When compared with placebo or standard of care, thromboprophylaxis was associated with similar rates of all-cause hospitalization or mortality (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.77-1.31) and lower rates of venous thromboembolism (relative risk, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.94), corresponding to a 0.6% absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat of 174.

CONCLUSION

Thromboprophylaxis in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients led to reduction in venous thromboembolism risk, with no impact on hospitalization or death. However, the overall low absolute risk reduction may not support its routine use.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情的全球影响促使人们寻求改善感染者治疗效果的策略,包括那些最初在门诊接受治疗的患者。血栓栓塞事件已被报道为一种令人担忧的并发症。

目的

本研究旨在评估新冠门诊患者一级血栓预防的疗效和安全性。该研究方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42022362776)登记。

方法

本研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对PubMed/MEDLINE、ClinicalTrials.gov以及Cochrane图书馆的OVID/Embase和CENTRAL数据库进行了全面检索,检索截至2023年12月11日的研究,无语言限制。纳入比较预防性剂量抗凝与安慰剂或标准治疗方案对有症状新冠门诊患者疗效的随机对照试验。主要结局是30天内全因住院和死亡的复合结局。次要结局包括静脉血栓栓塞、静脉血栓栓塞和主要动脉心血管事件的复合结局,以及主要结局的各个组成部分。

结果

纳入了7项随机对照试验和3758例新冠门诊患者。与安慰剂或标准治疗方案相比,血栓预防与全因住院或死亡率相似(相对风险,1.00;95%可信区间,0.77-1.31),且静脉血栓栓塞率较低(相对风险,0.28;95%可信区间,0.08-0.94),绝对风险降低0.6%,需治疗人数为174。

结论

有症状的新冠门诊患者进行血栓预防可降低静脉血栓栓塞风险,但对住院或死亡无影响。然而,总体绝对风险降低幅度较低,可能不支持常规使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d2b/11652863/cb58470b776d/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验