Suppr超能文献

COVID-19治疗性肝素的随机试验:一项荟萃分析。

Randomized trials of therapeutic heparin for COVID-19: A meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sholzberg Michelle, da Costa Bruno R, Tang Grace H, Rahhal Hassan, AlHamzah Musaad, Baumann Kreuziger Lisa, Ní Áinle Fionnuala, Almarshoodi Mozah Obaid, James Paula D, Lillicrap David, Carrier Marc, Beckett Andrew, Fralick Michael, Middeldorp Saskia, Lee Agnes Y Y, Thorpe Kevin E, Negri Elnara Márcia, Cushman Mary, Jüni Peter

机构信息

Department of Medicine St. Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology St. Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.

出版信息

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021 Dec 17;5(8):e12638. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12638. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endothelial injury and microcirculatory thromboses likely contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure, the most common cause of death, in patients with COVID-19. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggest differences in the effect of therapeutic heparin between moderately and severely ill patients with COVID-19. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to determine the effects of therapeutic heparin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, medRxiv, and medical conference proceedings for RCTs comparing therapeutic heparin with usual care, excluding trials that used oral anticoagulation or intermediate doses of heparin in the experimental arm. Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect meta-analysis was used to combine odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

There were 3 RCTs that compared therapeutic heparin to lower doses of heparin in 2854 moderately ill ward patients, and 3 RCTs in 1191 severely ill patients receiving critical care. In moderately ill patients, there was a nonsignificant reduction in all-cause death (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.57-1.02), but significant reductions in the composite of death or invasive mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 0.98), and death or any thrombotic event (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77). Organ support-free days alive (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.57) were significantly increased with therapeutic heparin. There was a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding. In severely ill patients, there was no evidence for benefit of therapeutic heparin, with significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions with illness severity for all-cause death (= .034). In conclusion, therapeutic heparin is beneficial in moderately ill patients but not in severely ill patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

摘要

背景

肺内皮损伤和微循环血栓形成可能是导致新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)患者低氧性呼吸衰竭(最常见的死亡原因)的原因。随机对照试验(RCT)表明,治疗性肝素对中度和重度COVID-19患者的疗效存在差异。我们对RCT进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以确定治疗性肝素对住院COVID-19患者的影响。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、medRxiv和医学会议论文集,以查找比较治疗性肝素与常规治疗的RCT,排除在实验组中使用口服抗凝剂或中等剂量肝素的试验。采用Mantel-Haenszel固定效应荟萃分析来合并比值比(OR)。

结果与结论

有3项RCT比较了治疗性肝素与较低剂量肝素对2854例中度病情病房患者的影响,以及3项RCT对1191例接受重症监护的重度患者的影响。在中度病情患者中,全因死亡有非显著降低(OR,0.76;95%CI,0.57-1.02),但死亡或有创机械通气的复合终点有显著降低(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.60-0.98),以及死亡或任何血栓形成事件有显著降低(OR,0.58;95%CI,0.45-0.77)。使用治疗性肝素显著增加了无器官支持存活天数(OR,1.29;95%CI,1.07-1.57)。大出血有非显著增加。在重度患者中,没有证据表明治疗性肝素有益处,全因死亡的疾病严重程度亚组间存在显著的治疗交互作用(P = 0.034)。总之,治疗性肝素对中度病情患者有益,但对住院的重度COVID-19患者无益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验