Comparison of tip-bendable aspiration-assisted and standard access sheaths in the treatment of lower calyceal stones.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the success and complication rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal renal stones performed with novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths and standard ureteral access sheaths.

METHODS

Between March 2023 and March 2024, a total of 88 patients underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower renal calyceal stones smaller than 20 mm. Based on the access sheath used, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=43) included patients treated with novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths and Group 2 (n=45) included patients treated with standard ureteral access sheaths. The pre- and postoperative data of the two groups were compared. Complications were assessed by using the Modified Clavine Dindo system, and stone-free rate was assessed after 4 weeks by using non-contrast computed tomography.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups regarding demographic data or preoperative laboratory results, and the median stone size was comparable in both groups. The stone-free rate did not show any significant difference between the two groups. However, the median residual stone size was substantially higher in the standard ureteral access sheaths group [4.25- (3.75-5) vs. 6- (5-7), p=0.01] and the surgical duration was less in the novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths group (p=0.032).

CONCLUSION

Our current findings demonstrate that the use of a new tip-bendable suction-assisted access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm may shorten the operative duration, limit the rate of complications, and end up with smaller residual stone fragments when compared with the use of standard ureteral access sheath.