Geller M J, Isner J M, Payne D D, Salem D N
Am J Med. 1985 Feb;78(2):351-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90449-8.
Although intravenous thrombosis frequently complicates placement of transvenous endocardial leads in patients with permanent pacemakers, clinical manifestations of upper extremity thrombosis are uncommon. Most, including upper extremity edema, cervical venous engorgement, and even superior vena cava syndrome, can be successfully managed with conservative therapy. In the patient described in the present report, clinical manifestations of pacemaker-electrode thrombosis were neither mild nor responsive to conservative therapies: in this patient, pacemaker-electrode thrombosis ultimately required amputation of the right upper extremity. Complications of the magnitude described in this patient emphasize the need for continual review of the indications for pacemaker therapy as understanding of the risk-benefit ratio of this procedure broadens.
尽管静脉血栓形成常常使永久性起搏器患者经静脉心内膜导线植入术变得复杂,但上肢血栓形成的临床表现并不常见。大多数情况,包括上肢水肿、颈静脉充血,甚至上腔静脉综合征,都可以通过保守治疗成功处理。在本报告所述的患者中,起搏器电极血栓形成的临床表现既不轻微,对保守治疗也无反应:在该患者中,起搏器电极血栓形成最终需要截肢右上肢。该患者所描述的如此严重的并发症强调,随着对该手术风险效益比的认识不断深入,有必要持续重新评估起搏器治疗的适应证。