Yang Richard K, Alvarez Hector, Lucas Antony San, Roy-Chowdhuri Sinchita, Rashid Asif, Chen Hui, Ballester Leomar Y, Sweeney Keith, Routbort Mark J, Patel Keyur P, Luthra Rajyalakshmi, Medeiros L Jeffrey, Toruner Gokce A
Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cancer Genet. 2025 Jan;290-291:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.12.002. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
Impairment of DNA mismatch repair function in neoplasms can be assessed by DNA-based methods to assess for high microsatellite instability (MSI-High) or immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis to assess for deficiency of mismatch repair proteins (dMMR). Neoplasms with mismatch repair deficiency often have high tumor mutational burden (TMB-High). MSI-High, dMMR, and TMB-High are all histology agnostic biomarkers for potential therapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). In this single center, retrospective study, our primary aim was to assess if NGS-based positive TMB/MSI findings are concordant with patient matched concurrent MMR IHC studies. In addition, we determined if positive TMB/MSI findings are attributable to genetic/epigenetic alterations of MMR genes. Finally, we explored potential associations between IHC, TMB and MSI findings and specific tumor types We screened 4,258 patients in our database who had tumor-normal-testing with our institutional high-throughput NGS-based CLIA assay between Apr 1, 2021-August 31, 2022 for TMB and MSI. We identified 65 patients who had neoplasms with documented TMB-High/MSI-High (n = 59) or TMB-High/MSI-Undetermined (n = 6) results as well as concurrent IHC results for MMR proteins [colorectal (n = 25), endometrial (n = 28), prostatic (n = 7), urothelial (n = 3), other (n = 5)]. The concordance between positive NGS TMB/MSI and MMR results was 98 %. Genetic/epigenetic alterations of MMR genes were documented in 78 % of the neoplasms. IHC studies for dMMR proteins revealed loss of MLH1/PMS2 (n = 33), MSH2/MSH6 (n = 14), MLH1/MSH2/PMS2 (n = 1), MLH1 (n = 1), MSH2 (n = 2), MSH6 (n = 6) and PMS2 (n = 6). All six prostatic neoplasms with dMMR had loss of MSH2/MSH6 (p < 0.0001). We conclude that neoplasms with positive results for TMB/MSI are highly concordant with positive dMMR results. Genetic/epigenetic alterations in the MMR genes are an underlying reason for most positive findings. The association of MSH2/MSH6 loss with prostatic neoplasms is of in-terest, but sample size is limited, and further studies are warranted to address this association.
肿瘤中DNA错配修复功能的损害可以通过基于DNA的方法来评估微卫星高度不稳定(MSI-High),或通过免疫组织化学(IHC)分析来评估错配修复蛋白缺陷(dMMR)。错配修复缺陷的肿瘤通常具有高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB-High)。MSI-High、dMMR和TMB-High都是可用于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)潜在治疗的与组织学无关的生物标志物。在这项单中心回顾性研究中,我们的主要目的是评估基于二代测序(NGS)的阳性TMB/MSI结果是否与患者匹配的同期MMR IHC研究结果一致。此外,我们确定阳性TMB/MSI结果是否归因于MMR基因的遗传/表观遗传改变。最后,我们探讨了IHC、TMB和MSI结果与特定肿瘤类型之间的潜在关联。我们在数据库中筛选了4258例患者,这些患者在2021年4月1日至2022年8月31日期间接受了我们机构基于高通量NGS的CLIA检测,以检测TMB和MSI。我们确定了65例肿瘤患者,其记录的结果为TMB-High/MSI-High(n = 59)或TMB-High/MSI未确定(n = 6),以及MMR蛋白的同期IHC结果[结直肠癌(n = 25)、子宫内膜癌(n = 28)、前列腺癌(n = 7)、尿路上皮癌(n = 3)、其他(n = 5)]。NGS阳性TMB/MSI与MMR结果之间的一致性为98%。78%的肿瘤记录了MMR基因的遗传/表观遗传改变。dMMR蛋白的IHC研究显示MLH1/PMS2缺失(n = 33)、MSH2/MSH6缺失(n = 14)、MLH1/MSH2/PMS2缺失(n = 1)、MLH1缺失(n = 1)、MSH2缺失(n = 2)、MSH6缺失(n = 6)和PMS2缺失(n = 6)。所有六例dMMR的前列腺肿瘤均有MSH2/MSH6缺失(p < 0.0001)。我们得出结论,TMB/MSI结果为阳性的肿瘤与dMMR阳性结果高度一致。MMR基因的遗传/表观遗传改变是大多数阳性结果的根本原因。MSH2/MSH6缺失与前列腺肿瘤的关联值得关注,但样本量有限,需要进一步研究来探讨这种关联。