Zhang Xini, Fu Baisheng, Li Yuxin, Deng Liqin, Fu Weijie
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Key Laboratory of Exercise and Health Sciences of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University of Sport, China.
Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Research Academy of Grand Health, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Gait Posture. 2025 Mar;117:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.12.017. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
Most running biomechanics studies have focused on either the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) or Achilles tendon (AT) alone, generating fragmented understanding of how these structures interact as components of an integrated kinetic chain during running. This study was to investigate concurrent biomechanical changes in the PFJ and AT in recreational runners.
The recreational runners who are accustomed to run with rearfoot strike (RFS, n = 15) and forefoot strike (FFS, n = 15) patterns were recruited. They were instructed to run at 10 km/h in cushion shoes with their habitual strike patterns on an instrumented split-belt treadmill. Kinematics of the ankle and knee joints in the sagittal plane and ground reaction forces were recorded simultaneously. The contact force and stress at the PFJ, as well as the force, loading rate, impulse, and stress of the AT, were calculated.
The habitual RFS runners had significantly higher peak extension moment (p = 0.019, ES = 0.906), peak quadriceps force (p = 0.010, ES = 1.008), PFJ contact force (p = 0.007, ES = 1.056) and stress (p = 0.042, ES = 0.958) than habitual FFS runners. The peak plantar flexion moment (p < 0.001, ES = 2.692), peak AT force (p < 0.001, ES = -1.788), average (p < 0.001, ES = -2.337) and peak AT loading rate (p < 0.001, ES =-1.996), AT impulse (p = 0.002, ES = -1.246) and stress (p = 0.006, ES = -1.082) of the habitual RFS runners were significantly lower than those of the habitual FFS runners.
The FFS pattern could decrease PFJ load but simultaneously increased the mechanical load on the AT. Conversely, the RFS pattern increased PFJ load, but imposed less load on the AT.
大多数跑步生物力学研究仅聚焦于髌股关节(PFJ)或跟腱(AT),对于这些结构在跑步过程中作为一个整合动力链的组成部分是如何相互作用的,产生了碎片化的理解。本研究旨在调查业余跑步者髌股关节和跟腱同时发生的生物力学变化。
招募习惯后足着地(RFS,n = 15)和前足着地(FFS,n = 15)模式的业余跑步者。他们被要求穿着减震鞋,以习惯的着地模式在装有仪器的分体跑台上以10公里/小时的速度跑步。同时记录矢状面内踝关节和膝关节的运动学以及地面反作用力。计算髌股关节的接触力和应力,以及跟腱的力、加载速率、冲量和应力。
习惯后足着地的跑步者比习惯前足着地的跑步者具有显著更高的峰值伸展力矩(p = 0.019,效应量 = 0.906)、股四头肌峰值力(p = 0.010,效应量 = 1.008)、髌股关节接触力(p = 0.007,效应量 = 1.056)和应力(p = 0.042,效应量 = 0.958)。习惯后足着地的跑步者的峰值跖屈力矩(p < 0.001,效应量 = 2.692)、跟腱峰值力(p < 0.001,效应量 = -1.788)、平均(p < 0.001,效应量 = -2.337)和跟腱峰值加载速率(p < 0.001,效应量 = -1.996)、跟腱冲量(p = 0.002,效应量 = -1.246)和应力(p = 0.006,效应量 = -1.082)显著低于习惯前足着地的跑步者。
前足着地模式可降低髌股关节负荷,但同时增加了跟腱的机械负荷。相反,后足着地模式增加了髌股关节负荷,但对跟腱施加的负荷较小。