Stürner Lukas, Henking Tanja, Juckel Georg, Gather Jakov, Steinert Tilman
Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie I, Universität Ulm (Weissenau), Ulm.
Institut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften (IFAS), Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Würzburg.
Psychiatr Prax. 2025 Apr;52(3):135-140. doi: 10.1055/a-2463-9581. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
To determine the circumstances of involuntary treatment under the German Civil Code (BGB) in psychiatric hospitals serving a catchment area.
Medical directors of psychiatric hospitals in Germany, including psychiatric departments at general hospitals and university clinics, were interviewed by means of an online survey.
The response rate among the N=397 institutions addressed was 43%. Coercive treatment according to the German Civil Code (BGB), which must be requested by a guardian and approved by a court, is relatively rare and mainly involves the forced administration of psychotropic drugs. 90% of the responding institutions had carried out such coercive treatment within the last five years. Involvement in involuntary treatment carried out in somatic hospitals was rarely reported. For the most part, it is not systematically recorded.
Taking into account the lack of data, there is a need for a national register of such intervention, including involuntary treatment in somatic hospitals.
确定在服务特定集水区的精神病院中,依据《德国民法典》(BGB)进行非自愿治疗的情况。
通过在线调查对德国精神病院的医疗主任进行访谈,这些医院包括综合医院和大学诊所的精神科。
在397家被调查机构中,回复率为43%。依据《德国民法典》(BGB)进行的强制治疗相对少见,必须由监护人提出申请并经法院批准,主要涉及强制使用精神药物。90%的回复机构在过去五年内进行过此类强制治疗。很少有机构报告参与了躯体医院进行的非自愿治疗,而且大多没有系统记录。
考虑到数据缺失,有必要建立一个此类干预措施的国家登记册,包括躯体医院中的非自愿治疗。