Haslam-Larmer Lynn, Krassikova Alexandra, Wojtowicz Elizabeth, Vellani Shirin, Feldman Sid, Katz Paul, Robert Benoit, Heer Carrie, Martin-Misener Ruth, May Kathryn, McGilton Katherine S
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2025 Feb;26(2):105418. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105418. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
Over the past decade, the role of nurse practitioners (NPs) in long-term care home (LTCH) settings has significantly expanded. Despite this trend, gaps have been identified in the description of collaborative practices between NPs and physicians in the LTCH sector. This study aimed to characterize the elements of collaboration between NPs and physicians in LTCH settings by applying the "Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model."
A secondary analysis of a scoping review that focuses on literature where NPs and physicians collaboratively provided care in LTCH settings.
The initial scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines and included 60 peer-reviewed articles. Data relevant to the 7 core elements of the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model-responsibility and accountability, coordination, communication, cooperation, assertiveness, autonomy, and mutual trust and respect-were extracted and analyzed. We included articles that described at least 1 element in the analysis.
Twenty-nine articles were included in the secondary analysis. The analysis revealed that coordination (n = 25) and communication (n = 23) were the most frequently reported elements. Coordination was often highlighted through descriptions of care delivery organization and decision-making processes, where NPs provided continuous oversight and referred complex cases to physicians. Effective communication pathways, such as joint rounding and face-to-face meetings, were essential for successful collaboration. In contrast, assertiveness (n = 3) was the least frequently discussed element.
Applying the Structured Collaborative Practice Core Model to the existing literature on NP and physician collaboration in LTCH settings underscores the importance of effective coordination and communication. Future work needs to investigate the historical and hierarchical dynamics influencing the relationship. Understanding these elements will inform strategies to optimize collaborative efforts, ultimately improving patient care outcomes in LTCH settings. The unique dynamics of NP and physician care models need to be considered.
在过去十年中,执业护士(NPs)在长期护理机构(LTCH)中的作用显著扩大。尽管有这一趋势,但在长期护理机构部门中,执业护士与医生之间的协作实践描述仍存在差距。本研究旨在通过应用“结构化协作实践核心模型”来描述长期护理机构中执业护士与医生之间协作的要素。
对一项范围综述的二次分析,该综述聚焦于执业护士和医生在长期护理机构中协作提供护理的文献。
最初的范围综述遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA-ScR指南,纳入了60篇同行评审文章。提取并分析了与结构化协作实践核心模型的7个核心要素相关的数据,这些要素包括责任与问责、协调、沟通合作、自信、自主性、相互信任与尊重。我们纳入了在分析中描述至少一个要素的文章。
二次分析纳入了29篇文章。分析显示,协调(n = 25)和沟通(n = 23)是报告最频繁的要素。协调通常通过对护理提供组织和决策过程的描述来突出,其中执业护士提供持续监督并将复杂病例转诊给医生。有效的沟通途径,如联合查房和面对面会议,对于成功协作至关重要。相比之下,自信(n = 3)是讨论最少的要素。
将结构化协作实践核心模型应用于长期护理机构中执业护士与医生协作的现有文献,凸显了有效协调和沟通的重要性。未来的工作需要研究影响这种关系的历史和层级动态。理解这些要素将为优化协作努力的策略提供信息,最终改善长期护理机构中的患者护理结果。需要考虑执业护士和医生护理模式的独特动态。