Hoxha Ilir, Basha-Berisha Vlora, Selmani Erza, Bahtiri Shege, Bytyci-Katanolli Ariana, Imeti Ardian, Valentine Paula, Gerold Jana
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
Evidence Synthesis Group, Prishtina, Kosova.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):3537. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21053-z.
Participation and inclusion of service users in health governance impact the quality of care and citizen well-being. In developing countries, such as Kosovo, disadvantaged groups are particularly important due to deep exclusionary structures and multiple systemic barriers to participation and care provision.
To investigate the effects of three interventions on social participation in decision-making in several primary healthcare sites among the population and particularly vulnerable groups, i.e. ethnic minorities of Roma, Ashkali, and Egyptian backgrounds, elderly citizens, and people with disabilities.
This study uses the consolidated framework of social participation and adapts it to Kosovo's primary healthcare context. We analysed the degrees of inclusiveness, intensity, and influence across three interventions, i.e., social participation mechanisms implemented in four municipalities and related primary care networks in Kosovo. We applied an embedded multiple-case study design relying on qualitative data collection.
Degrees of social participation within each case study ranged from low to moderate. Patient councils serve as representative mechanisms to consider patient complaints with an informative and liaising role. The community scorecard mechanism involves community representatives in decision-making processes, with varying levels of inclusiveness and participation intensity, effectively voicing their preferences and demands. The municipal health action plans process exhibits varying inclusiveness levels where community representatives wield decision-making influence.
The participation mechanisms examined in this study could sustain moderate social participation across inclusiveness, intensity, influence and impact domains. These shared platforms between service users and providers produce the most meaningful influence. The use of these mechanisms has a promise of increasing social participation in primary care settings in Kosovo.
服务使用者参与并融入卫生治理会影响医疗质量和公民福祉。在科索沃等发展中国家,由于存在严重的排斥结构以及参与和提供护理方面的多重系统性障碍,弱势群体尤为重要。
调查三种干预措施对若干初级医疗保健场所中全体人群特别是弱势群体(即罗姆族、阿什卡利族和埃及裔少数民族、老年公民和残疾人)社会参与决策的影响。
本研究采用社会参与综合框架并将其应用于科索沃的初级医疗保健背景。我们分析了三种干预措施(即在科索沃四个城市及相关初级保健网络中实施的社会参与机制)的包容度、强度和影响力。我们采用了基于定性数据收集的嵌入式多案例研究设计。
每个案例研究中的社会参与程度从低到中不等。患者委员会作为代表性机制,以提供信息和联络的角色来审议患者投诉。社区计分卡机制让社区代表参与决策过程,包容度和参与强度各不相同,有效地表达了他们的偏好和需求。市政卫生行动计划过程的包容度水平各不相同,社区代表在其中发挥决策影响力。
本研究中考察的参与机制可在包容度、强度、影响力和效果等方面维持适度的社会参与。服务使用者和提供者之间的这些共享平台产生了最有意义的影响。使用这些机制有望提高科索沃初级保健环境中的社会参与度。