Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre/National Clinical Research Centre for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Centre/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China.
Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.600. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Primary analysis of the phase III trial BG01-1323L demonstrated that utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) versus capecitabine alone in heavily-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis and updates of other endpoints.
In total, 405 patients were randomised 2:1 to receive utidelone (30 mg/m IV daily, days 1-5, over 90 min) plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m orally b.i.d., days 1-14) or capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m orally b.i.d., days 1-14) every 21 days. The secondary endpoint, OS, was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit approach at a two-sided alpha level of 0.05 after the prespecified 310 death events had been reached. Exploratory analyses of the primary endpoint, PFS, and the secondary endpoint, ORR, were also done. Safety was analysed in patients who had at least one dose of study drug.
At the final OS analysis, the median duration of follow-up was 19.6 months in the utidelone plus capecitabine group and 15.4 months in the capecitabine alone group. In the intention-to-treat population, 313 deaths had occurred at data cut-off, 203 of 270 patients in the combination group and 110 of 135 in the monotherapy group. Median OS in the combination group was 19.8 months compared with 16.0 months in the monotherapy group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.59-0.94, P = 0.0142]. The updated analysis of PFS and ORR showed that the combination therapy remained superior to monotherapy. Safety results were similar to those previously reported with respect to incidence, severity and specificity. No late-emerging toxicities or new safety concerns occurred.
For heavily-pretreated, anthracycline- and taxane-resistant MBC patients, utidelone plus capecitabine significantly improved OS versus capecitabine alone. These results support the use of utidelone plus capecitabine as a novel therapeutic regimen for patients with MBC.
III 期 BG01-1323L 试验的初步分析表明,与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者中,联合 utidelone 和卡培他滨可显著提高无进展生存期(PFS)和总缓解率(ORR)。这里,我们报告最终的总生存期(OS)分析结果和其他终点的更新。
总计 405 名患者按 2:1 的比例随机分为 utidelone(30mg/m 静脉注射,每天一次,第 1-5 天,持续 90 分钟)加卡培他滨(1000mg/m 口服,每天两次,第 1-14 天)组或卡培他滨单药组(1250mg/m 口服,每天两次,第 1-14 天)。次要终点 OS 在达到预定的 310 例死亡事件后,采用双侧 alpha 水平为 0.05 的 Kaplan-Meier 乘积限法进行估计。还对主要终点 PFS 和次要终点 ORR 进行了探索性分析。在至少接受一次研究药物治疗的患者中进行安全性分析。
在最终的 OS 分析中,utidelone 加卡培他滨组的中位随访时间为 19.6 个月,卡培他滨单药组为 15.4 个月。在意向治疗人群中,数据截止时共有 313 例死亡,联合组 270 例患者中有 203 例,单药组 135 例患者中有 110 例。联合组的中位 OS 为 19.8 个月,而单药组为 16.0 个月[风险比(HR)=0.75,95%置信区间(CI)0.59-0.94,P=0.0142]。更新的 PFS 和 ORR 分析显示,联合治疗仍优于单药治疗。安全性结果与之前报道的发生率、严重程度和特异性相似。没有出现新的毒性作用或新的安全性问题。
对于多线治疗、蒽环类和紫杉类耐药的 MBC 患者,与卡培他滨单药治疗相比,utidelone 加卡培他滨可显著提高 OS。这些结果支持 utidelone 加卡培他滨作为 MBC 患者的一种新的治疗方案。