Zhang Yuejuan, Li Zijian, Ding Cheng, Zhao Jun, Ye Li, Shen Ziqing, Song Xinyu
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Marketing, Neorad Medical Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201100, China.
BMC Surg. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02698-4.
Pulmonary nodule ablation is an effective method for treating pulmonary nodules. This study is based on the traditional CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of pulmonary nodules. By comparing laser guidance technology with freehand method, this study aims to explore the safety and efficacy and patients' pain scores of these two approaches.
This study retrospectively analyzed 126 patients who underwent CT-guided percutaneous lung ablation at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2020 to April 2024. Based on the guidance method, we divided those patients into the laser guidance group and the freehand group. The primary outcome such as operation time, the number of ablation needle adjustments, postoperative pain scores, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed.
The laser guidance group had a significantly shorter mean operation time compared to the freehand group (39.3 ± 13.65 min vs. 43.82 ± 19.12 min, p < 0.01), and in the laser guidance group, fewer ablation needle adjustments were required than in the freehand group (3.3 ± 1.34 time vs. 4.37 ± 1.39 times, p < 0.001). As compared to the freehand group, the laser guidance group had fewer cases of mild pneumothorax (13.16% vs. 38.33%, p < 0.05). The postoperative pain score at 1 h and 1 day of the two groups showed no statistical difference.
Both methods are safe and effective. The laser guidance technology significantly reduces the number of puncture adjustments and the operation time compared to the freehand method. Laser guidance technology effectively reduces the incidence of mild pneumothorax.
肺结节消融是治疗肺结节的一种有效方法。本研究基于传统的CT引导下经皮肺结节微波消融术(MWA)。通过比较激光引导技术与徒手操作方法,本研究旨在探讨这两种方法的安全性、有效性及患者的疼痛评分。
本研究回顾性分析了2020年4月至2024年4月在苏州大学附属第一医院接受CT引导下经皮肺消融术的126例患者。根据引导方法,将这些患者分为激光引导组和徒手组。分析手术时间、消融针调整次数、术后疼痛评分、术后住院时间及术后并发症等主要结局指标。
与徒手组相比,激光引导组的平均手术时间显著缩短(39.3±13.65分钟 vs. 43.82±19.12分钟,p<0.01),且激光引导组所需的消融针调整次数少于徒手组(3.3±1.34次 vs. 4.37±1.39次,p<0.001)。与徒手组相比,激光引导组轻度气胸的病例较少(13.16% vs. 38.33%,p<0.05)。两组术后1小时和1天的疼痛评分无统计学差异。
两种方法均安全有效。与徒手方法相比,激光引导技术显著减少了穿刺调整次数和手术时间。激光引导技术有效降低了轻度气胸的发生率。