Hooge Ignace T C, Hessels Roy S, Niehorster Diederick C, Andersson Richard, Skrok Marta K, Konklewski Robert, Stremplewski Patrycjusz, Nowakowski Maciej, Tamborski Szymon, Szkulmowska Anna, Szkulmowski Maciej, Nyström Marcus
Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lund University Humanities Lab and Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 19;57(1):23. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4.
Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.
无论精度如何,基于瞳孔的眼动追踪仪的不准确度约为0.5 。本文深入探讨了两个可能增加注视信号不准确度的因素,即:1)瞳孔大小变化和瞳孔大小伪影(PSA),以及2)有经验的个体可能无法精确重新注视视觉目标。实验1使用传统的瞳孔 - CR眼动追踪仪,而实验2采用视网膜眼动追踪仪FreezeEye追踪仪,消除了基于瞳孔的估计。结果表明,PSA显著影响注视准确性,在校准和验证过程中引入高达0.5 的不准确度。基于瞳孔大小与明显注视偏移之间关系的校正可大幅降低不准确度,突出了PSA对眼动追踪质量的影响。相反,实验2证明了人类精确重新注视的能力,表明注视信号的准确性不受人类重新注视不一致性的限制。