Bourke Jaryd, Munteanu Shannon, Garofolini Alessandro, Taylor Simon, Malliaras Peter
Physiotherapy Department, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2024 Dec;17(4):e70025. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70025.
Insertional Achilles tendinopathy is a common and disabling condition. This trial aimed to determine the feasibility of conducting a parallel group randomised trial to evaluate the efficacy of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention for reducing pain intensity associated with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
Twenty-six people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy were randomised to either the heel lift group or sham intervention group. Outcome measures were obtained at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was feasibility, evaluated according to demand (recruitment rate and conversion rate), acceptability, adherence, adverse events and retention. Limited efficacy testing was conducted on secondary outcome measures including pain intensity, function, physical activity, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and global rating of change.
Between August 25, 2023, and April 7, 2024, we recruited and tested 26 participants (aged 28-65 years, mean [SD] 51 [8]). The pre-determined thresholds were met for demand, acceptability, adherence, retention, pain intensity, function, quality of life and global rating of change and partly met for adverse events, physical activity and use of co-interventions. Between 47 and 241, participants will be needed for a fully powered randomised trial.
In its current form, a randomised trial of heel lifts compared to a sham intervention is feasible. However, future triallists may need to consider strategies to manage the risk of adverse events and plan to adjust the analyses to account for the use of co-interventions.
ACTRN12623000721606.
跟腱附着点性肌腱病是一种常见且致残的疾病。本试验旨在确定进行一项平行组随机试验的可行性,以评估足跟垫与假干预相比,在减轻跟腱附着点性肌腱病相关疼痛强度方面的疗效。
26名跟腱附着点性肌腱病患者被随机分为足跟垫组或假干预组。在基线、4周、8周和12周时获取结局指标。主要结局是可行性,根据需求(招募率和转化率)、可接受性、依从性、不良事件和保留率进行评估。对次要结局指标进行了有限的疗效测试,包括疼痛强度、功能、身体活动、健康相关生活质量、联合干预的使用情况和整体变化评分。
在2023年8月25日至2024年4月7日期间,我们招募并测试了26名参与者(年龄28 - 65岁,平均[标准差]51 [8])。在需求、可接受性、依从性、保留率、疼痛强度、功能、生活质量和整体变化评分方面达到了预定阈值,在不良事件、身体活动和联合干预的使用方面部分达到预定阈值。一项充分有力的随机试验将需要47至241名参与者。
以目前的形式,与假干预相比,足跟垫随机试验是可行的。然而,未来的试验者可能需要考虑管理不良事件风险的策略,并计划调整分析以考虑联合干预的使用情况。
ACTRN12623000721606。