Alsulaimani Baraa, Perraton Luke, Vallance Patrick, Powers Tim, Malliaras Peter
Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Faculty of Education, Monash Data Futures Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2025 Feb;39(2):174-186. doi: 10.1177/02692155241295683. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
To investigate the efficacy of adding radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to exercise for people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
A two-armed, parallel-group, explanatory, single-centre, randomised controlled trial within a superiority framework.
Private clinic.
People diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.
A total of 76 people were randomly assigned (one-to-one ratio) to receive three sessions of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to the affected side (or most affected side if bilateral). All participants received identical education and exercise.
The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles questionnaire. Measures were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.
At 12 weeks, the questionnaire data were available for 37 people (96%) in the radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and 36 people (95%) in the sham group. For the primary outcome, we found no evidence for between-group differences at 6 (3, 95% confidence interval -4.6-10.5) or 12 weeks (4.6, 95% confidence interval -2.5-11.6). There was also no evidence for a between-group difference for any secondary outcome measures at either 6 or 12 weeks ( > .05). No serious adverse events were reported.
The addition of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise and education did not lead to improvements in pain, function or other outcomes compared to sham at 6 or 12 weeks among people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. ACTRN12620000035921.
探讨对跟腱附着点病患者在运动基础上增加径向体外冲击波疗法或安慰剂治疗的疗效。
在优效性框架内进行的双臂、平行组、解释性、单中心随机对照试验。
私人诊所。
年龄超过18岁、症状持续时间超过3个月且被诊断为跟腱附着点病的患者。
共76人被随机分配(一对一比例)接受患侧(若双侧则为最患侧)的3次径向体外冲击波治疗或安慰剂治疗。所有参与者接受相同的教育和运动指导。
主要观察指标为维多利亚运动评估机构-跟腱问卷。在基线、6周和12周时记录各项指标。
在12周时,径向体外冲击波治疗组有37人(96%)、安慰剂组有36人(95%)的问卷数据可用。对于主要观察指标,我们发现在6周时(差值3,95%置信区间-4.6至10.5)或12周时(差值4.6,95%置信区间-2.5至11.6),两组间无差异证据。在6周或12周时,任何次要观察指标在两组间也均无差异证据(P>0.05)。未报告严重不良事件。
对于跟腱附着点病患者,在运动和教育基础上增加径向体外冲击波疗法,与安慰剂相比,在6周或12周时未使疼痛、功能或其他结局得到改善。澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册编号:ACTRN12620000035921。