Suppr超能文献

对于跟腱附着点炎患者,在12周的时间里,冲击波疗法在缓解疼痛和改善功能方面是否比假治疗更有效?一项随机对照试验。

Does shockwave therapy lead to better pain and function than sham over 12 weeks in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Alsulaimani Baraa, Perraton Luke, Vallance Patrick, Powers Tim, Malliaras Peter

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary Health Care, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Faculty of Education, Monash Data Futures Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2025 Feb;39(2):174-186. doi: 10.1177/02692155241295683. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of adding radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to exercise for people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

DESIGN

A two-armed, parallel-group, explanatory, single-centre, randomised controlled trial within a superiority framework.

SETTING

Private clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

People diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.

INTERVENTION

A total of 76 people were randomly assigned (one-to-one ratio) to receive three sessions of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy or sham to the affected side (or most affected side if bilateral). All participants received identical education and exercise.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment - Achilles questionnaire. Measures were recorded at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, the questionnaire data were available for 37 people (96%) in the radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy group and 36 people (95%) in the sham group. For the primary outcome, we found no evidence for between-group differences at 6 (3, 95% confidence interval -4.6-10.5) or 12 weeks (4.6, 95% confidence interval -2.5-11.6). There was also no evidence for a between-group difference for any secondary outcome measures at either 6 or 12 weeks ( > .05). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The addition of radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy to exercise and education did not lead to improvements in pain, function or other outcomes compared to sham at 6 or 12 weeks among people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. ACTRN12620000035921.

摘要

目的

探讨对跟腱附着点病患者在运动基础上增加径向体外冲击波疗法或安慰剂治疗的疗效。

设计

在优效性框架内进行的双臂、平行组、解释性、单中心随机对照试验。

地点

私人诊所。

参与者

年龄超过18岁、症状持续时间超过3个月且被诊断为跟腱附着点病的患者。

干预措施

共76人被随机分配(一对一比例)接受患侧(若双侧则为最患侧)的3次径向体外冲击波治疗或安慰剂治疗。所有参与者接受相同的教育和运动指导。

观察指标

主要观察指标为维多利亚运动评估机构-跟腱问卷。在基线、6周和12周时记录各项指标。

结果

在12周时,径向体外冲击波治疗组有37人(96%)、安慰剂组有36人(95%)的问卷数据可用。对于主要观察指标,我们发现在6周时(差值3,95%置信区间-4.6至10.5)或12周时(差值4.6,95%置信区间-2.5至11.6),两组间无差异证据。在6周或12周时,任何次要观察指标在两组间也均无差异证据(P>0.05)。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

对于跟腱附着点病患者,在运动和教育基础上增加径向体外冲击波疗法,与安慰剂相比,在6周或12周时未使疼痛、功能或其他结局得到改善。澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册编号:ACTRN12620000035921。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a84/11846266/0ce37ce21fbd/10.1177_02692155241295683-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验