Suppr超能文献

分离研究者观察对身体活动测量反应性的作用。

Isolating the role of researcher observation on reactivity to the measurement of physical activity.

作者信息

König Laura M, Pasko Kristen, Baga Kiri, Harsora Raj, Arigo Danielle

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Austria.

Faculty of Life Sciences: Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Bayreuth, Germany.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Feb;17(1):e12630. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12630.

Abstract

Reactivity to physical activity (PA) measurement may result from the introduction of a measurement device, researcher observation, or both. Accessing data from prior to study enrollment afforded the rare opportunity to compare behavior during versus prior to participation. This study introduced researcher observation among adults who owned their own PA monitoring device, to test whether measurement reactivity can also be observed in experienced PA trackers, by comparing their data from before versus after the introduction of observation. In addition, the salience of researcher observation was manipulated to test for potential effects. Participants were 252 adults in the U.S. They completed two electronic surveys 14 days apart, in which they recorded steps per day as collected by their PA monitors over the previous 14 days. At the end of the first survey, they were randomized to view messages, which differed in emphasis on repeating entry of step data (i.e., "low" vs. "high" salience of researcher observation). Daily step counts did not change between 14-day reporting periods, though patterns differed by gender and starting level of PA. Patterns did not differ between experimental conditions. Overall, introducing researcher observation without introducing an unfamiliar measurement device results in no meaningful reactivity with respect to PA.

摘要

对身体活动(PA)测量的反应性可能源于测量设备的引入、研究人员的观察或两者兼而有之。获取研究入组前的数据提供了一个难得的机会,可比较参与期间与参与之前的行为。本研究在拥有自己的PA监测设备的成年人中引入了研究人员观察,通过比较引入观察前后的数据,来测试在经验丰富的PA追踪者中是否也能观察到测量反应性。此外,对研究人员观察的显著性进行了操纵,以测试潜在影响。参与者为252名美国成年人。他们相隔14天完成了两次电子调查,在调查中记录了PA监测器在前14天收集的每日步数。在第一次调查结束时,他们被随机分组观看信息,这些信息在强调重复输入步数数据方面有所不同(即研究人员观察的“低”显著性与“高”显著性)。尽管模式因性别和PA起始水平而异,但在14天报告期内每日步数没有变化。实验条件之间的模式没有差异。总体而言,在不引入不熟悉的测量设备的情况下引入研究人员观察,不会导致对PA产生有意义的反应性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验