Jazinaki Mostafa Shahraki, Safarian Mohammad, Arabi Seyyed Mostafa, Jamali Jamshid, Norouzy Abdolreza
Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 5;11:1438158. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1438158. eCollection 2024.
The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) recently proposed a new malnutrition diagnostic tool known as the GLIM criteria. The GLIM criteria need confirmed validation before being widely used in each population or healthcare system. This study aimed to investigate the validation of the GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients.
The content validity was assessed by calculating the content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI). Subjective global assessment (SGA) is considered the reference tool to diagnose malnutrition in concurrent validation. In addition, the Kuder-Richardson 20 was used to evaluate the reliability of the GLIM criteria. Furthermore, hospital mortality, length of hospitalization (LOS), prolonged hospital stays (LOS >6 days), 30-day hospital readmission, and 30- and 60-day mortality were identified as malnutrition-related outcomes in predictive validity.
A total of 332 adult/elderly hospitalized patients (median age: 58 (IQR: 24.7), 60.5% men) were enrolled to present the study. Appling GLIM criteria by considering the calf circumference < 31 cm in both genders or mid-upper arm (MUAC) < 23 cm in men and MUAC <22 cm in women as reduced muscle mass had an appropriate accuracy (84.6 and 83.4%, respectively), good ability to distinguish malnourished patients (AUC ROC: 0.85 and 0.83, respectively), satisfactory sensitivity (89.58 and 84.02%, respectively), and satisfactory specificity (81 and 83%, respectively) compared to the SGA tool. Furthermore, the reliability of the GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis in hospitalized patients was acceptable in all 3 applied approaches (KR-20 > 0.5). The malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM criteria could significantly predict the odds of prolonged hospital stays, 30-day hospital readmission, and 60-day mortality, while it had no significant association with the risk of hospital mortality.
The current study revealed that applying GLIM criteria had satisfactory validity in diagnosing hospital malnutrition in non-critically ill hospitalized patients.
全球营养不良领导倡议组织(GLIM)最近提出了一种新的营养不良诊断工具,即GLIM标准。在各人群或医疗保健系统中广泛使用之前,GLIM标准需要经过确认验证。本研究旨在调查GLIM标准在住院患者营养不良诊断中的验证情况。
通过计算内容效度比(CVR)和内容效度指数(CVI)来评估内容效度。在同时效度验证中,主观全面评定法(SGA)被视为诊断营养不良的参考工具。此外,使用库德-理查森20公式来评估GLIM标准的可靠性。此外,医院死亡率、住院时间(LOS)、延长住院时间(LOS>6天)、30天再入院率以及30天和60天死亡率被确定为预测效度中与营养不良相关的结局。
共纳入332例成年/老年住院患者(中位年龄:58岁(四分位间距:24.7),男性占60.5%)以呈现本研究。通过将两性小腿围<31 cm或男性上臂中段周长(MUAC)<23 cm以及女性MUAC<22 cm视为肌肉量减少来应用GLIM标准,其具有适当的准确性(分别为84.6%和83.4%),区分营养不良患者的能力良好(ROC曲线下面积:分别为0.85和0.83),敏感性令人满意(分别为89.58%和84.02%),与SGA工具相比特异性也令人满意(分别为81%和83%)。此外,在所有3种应用方法中,GLIM标准用于住院患者营养不良诊断的可靠性是可接受的(KR-20>0.5)。由GLIM标准诊断出的营养不良可显著预测延长住院时间、30天再入院率和60天死亡率的几率,而与医院死亡风险无显著关联。
当前研究表明,应用GLIM标准在诊断非危重症住院患者的医院营养不良方面具有令人满意的效度。