Wong Chloe R, Karpinski Marta, Davidge Kristen M, Klassen Anne, Dengler Jana
From the Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):e6408. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006408. eCollection 2024 Dec.
The goal of managing patients with peripheral nerve injuries is to improve how a patient feels and functions. This goal is best assessed with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which elicit patient concerns, treatment goals, and clinical progression. This study reviews existing PROMs for adult patients with peripheral nerve injuries to assess how comprehensively they measure outcomes important to patients.
A systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase (from inception to August 13, 2022) was conducted to identify PROMs developed for adult patients with peripheral nerve injuries. Studies were included if (1) the study population involved traumatic or acquired peripheral nerve injuries; (2) they were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or single-arm observational studies; (3) participants were 18 years or older; and (4) PROMs were used to assess quality of life or patient satisfaction.
A total of 378 studies were included in this systematic review. We identified 141 unique PROMs used in the adult peripheral nerve injury literature: 20 are disease-specific (14%), 10 are function-specific (7%), 19 are mental health and well-being-specific (13%), 11 are quality of life-specific (8%), 32 are body region-specific (23%), 29 are symptom-specific (21%), 3 are satisfaction-specific (2%), 15 are generic (11%), and 2 are other (1%).
There exists considerable heterogeneity of PROMs used in research on patients with peripheral nerve injuries. None of the PROMs comprehensively assess this patient population. The need for the development of a comprehensive PROM for this patient population is highlighted.
管理周围神经损伤患者的目标是改善患者的感觉和功能。这一目标最好通过患者报告结局测量(PROMs)来评估,该测量可引出患者的担忧、治疗目标和临床进展。本研究回顾了现有的用于成年周围神经损伤患者的PROMs,以评估它们对患者重要结局的测量全面程度。
对Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus、科学网和Embase(从创刊到2022年8月13日)进行系统综述,以确定为成年周围神经损伤患者开发的PROMs。纳入的研究需满足以下条件:(1)研究人群涉及创伤性或后天性周围神经损伤;(2)为随机对照试验、队列研究或单臂观察性研究;(3)参与者年龄在18岁及以上;(4)使用PROMs评估生活质量或患者满意度。
本系统综述共纳入378项研究。我们在成年周围神经损伤文献中确定了141种独特的PROMs:20种是疾病特异性的(14%),10种是功能特异性的(7%),19种是心理健康和幸福感特异性的(13%),11种是生活质量特异性的(8%),32种是身体部位特异性(23%),29种是症状特异性的(21%),3种是满意度特异性的(2%),15种是通用的(11%),2种是其他的(1%)。
在周围神经损伤患者研究中使用的PROMs存在相当大的异质性。没有一种PROMs能全面评估这一患者群体。强调了为这一患者群体开发综合PROMs的必要性。