• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用多变量方法对德国职场健康促进中不参与情况的代表性分析。

A Representative Analysis of Nonparticipation in Workplace Health Promotion in Germany Using Multivariable Methods.

作者信息

Pache Birgit, Herbig Britta, Nowak Dennis, Janssen Christian

机构信息

Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany.

Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;69:1607261. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607261. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/ijph.2024.1607261
PMID:39703477
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11655221/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Studies have identified sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors that promote participation in workplace health promotion activities. The present study therefore focuses on what influences nonparticipation within a representative sample of the German population.

METHODS

In the analysis of possible factors influencing nonparticipation, company characteristics are accounted for in addition to sociodemographic and health behaviour-related variables. The data used for the analysis are from the GEDA study 2014/2015-EHIS of the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin.

RESULTS

Age largely increased the probability of nonparticipation (OR: between 1.30 and 1.92, p: between <0.001 and 0.033). Other possible influencing factors, such as weight, smoking status, alcohol consumption, exercise status and diet, seemed to play a rather minor role in the present analysis. Self-rated belonging to a certain socioeconomic status group also had a significant influence (OR: 0.76, p: <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The influencing factors seem to be of a sociodemographic and socioeconomic nature. These determinants should be accounted for to reduce nonparticipation. However, a comparison with current or longitudinal data would be needed to prove to what extent the results are still valid or influenced by a cohort effect.

摘要

目标

研究已经确定了促进参与职场健康促进活动的社会人口统计学和社会经济因素。因此,本研究聚焦于在德国人口的代表性样本中,是什么因素影响了不参与情况。

方法

在分析影响不参与的可能因素时,除了社会人口统计学和与健康行为相关的变量外,还考虑了公司特征。用于分析的数据来自柏林罗伯特·科赫研究所的2014/2015 - EHIS德国健康访谈与体检调查(GEDA)研究。

结果

年龄在很大程度上增加了不参与的可能性(优势比:在1.30至1.92之间,p值:在<0.001至0.033之间)。在本分析中,其他可能的影响因素,如体重、吸烟状况、饮酒量、运动状况和饮食,似乎起到的作用较小。自我评定属于某个社会经济地位群体也有显著影响(优势比:0.76,p值:<0.001)。

结论

影响因素似乎具有社会人口统计学和社会经济性质。为了减少不参与情况,应该考虑这些决定因素。然而,需要与当前数据或纵向数据进行比较,以证明结果在多大程度上仍然有效或受到队列效应的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/11655221/18a6d554a0d7/ijph-69-1607261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/11655221/18a6d554a0d7/ijph-69-1607261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/11655221/18a6d554a0d7/ijph-69-1607261-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Representative Analysis of Nonparticipation in Workplace Health Promotion in Germany Using Multivariable Methods.运用多变量方法对德国职场健康促进中不参与情况的代表性分析。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;69:1607261. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607261. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors in the Use of Workplace Health Promotion on Back Health. Results of the Survey "German Health Update".工作场所健康促进对背部健康的利用因素。“德国健康动态调查”的结果。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:638242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.638242. eCollection 2021.
3
[The use of workplace health promotion interventions in Germany-results of the study "German Health Update" (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS)].[德国工作场所健康促进干预措施的使用——“德国健康更新”(GEDA 2014/2015 - EHIS)研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Dec;63(12):1491-1501. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03239-z. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Determinants of participation in a web-based health risk assessment and consequences for health promotion programs.基于网络的健康风险评估参与度的决定因素及对健康促进项目的影响
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 9;15(8):e151. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2387.
5
Determinants of health check attendance in adults: findings from the cross-sectional German Health Update (GEDA) study.成人健康检查参与率的决定因素:德国健康更新(GEDA)横断面研究的结果
BMC Public Health. 2014 Sep 4;14:913. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-913.
6
Workforce Characteristics and Attitudes Regarding Participation in Worksite Wellness Programs.关于参与工作场所健康计划的劳动力特征和态度。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Sep;31(5):391-400. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140613-QUAN-283. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in effectiveness of and compliance to workplace health promotion programs: an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis.工作场所健康促进计划效果和依从性的社会经济不平等:个体参与者数据(IPD)荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Sep 4;17(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01002-w.
8
Chewing ability and associated factors in older adults in Germany. Results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS.德国老年人的咀嚼能力及相关因素。2019/2020 年德国健康和营养调查的结果-欧洲健康调查。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Dec 9;23(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03736-y.
9
[Workplace Health Promotion in Germany for All? Results of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA survey of Employed People].[德国全民职场健康促进?2018年联邦职业教育与培训研究所/联邦劳动保护和职业病防治研究所对就业人员的调查结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Apr;85(4):277-288. doi: 10.1055/a-1658-0125. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
10
[Determinants of workplace health promotion in the insurance sector: results of a complete survey of German insurance companies in 2006].[保险行业工作场所健康促进的决定因素:2006年德国保险公司全面调查结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2009 Nov;71(11):722-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1202784. Epub 2009 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A vertical-horizontal approach to examine social inequalities in early onset type 2 diabetes in the German workforce through occupational sector, education and income.一种通过职业部门、教育程度和收入来研究德国劳动力中早发型2型糖尿病社会不平等现象的纵向-横向方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 26;15(1):10390. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95326-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-specific and cause-specific mortality contributions to the socioeconomic gap in life expectancy in Germany, 2003-21: an ecological study.德国 2003-21 年特定年龄段和特定病因的死亡率对预期寿命社会经济差距的贡献:一项生态学研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2024 May;9(5):e295-e305. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00049-5.
2
Barrier profiles in workplace health promotion in Germany.德国工作场所健康促进中的障碍概况。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Feb 1;38(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac125.
3
[Workplace Health Promotion in Germany for All? Results of the 2018 BIBB/BAuA survey of Employed People].
[德国全民职场健康促进?2018年联邦职业教育与培训研究所/联邦劳动保护和职业病防治研究所对就业人员的调查结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2023 Apr;85(4):277-288. doi: 10.1055/a-1658-0125. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
4
Factors in the Use of Workplace Health Promotion on Back Health. Results of the Survey "German Health Update".工作场所健康促进对背部健康的利用因素。“德国健康动态调查”的结果。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:638242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.638242. eCollection 2021.
5
[The use of workplace health promotion interventions in Germany-results of the study "German Health Update" (GEDA 2014/2015-EHIS)].[德国工作场所健康促进干预措施的使用——“德国健康更新”(GEDA 2014/2015 - EHIS)研究结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020 Dec;63(12):1491-1501. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03239-z. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
[Measuring subjective social status in health research with a German version of the MacArthur Scale].[使用德语版麦克阿瑟量表在健康研究中测量主观社会地位]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Jul;58(7):749-57. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2166-x.
7
[Workplace Health Promotion in Germany: Prevalence and Utilisation. Analyses on Labour Force Surveys of the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health in 2006 and 2012].[德国的工作场所健康促进:患病率与利用率。对联邦职业安全与健康研究所2006年和2012年劳动力调查的分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Jan;78(1):56-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387744. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
8
A focus group assessment to determine motivations, barriers and effectiveness of a university-based worksite wellness program.一项焦点小组评估,以确定基于大学的工作场所健康计划的动机、障碍和有效性。
Health Promot Perspect. 2013 Dec 31;3(2):154-64. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2013.019. eCollection 2013.
9
[Measurement of the socioeconomic status within the German Health Update 2009 (GEDA)].[2009年德国健康更新调查(GEDA)中社会经济地位的测量]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 Jan;56(1):131-43. doi: 10.1007/s00103-012-1583-3.
10
The influence of social determinants on the use of prevention and health promotion services: Results of a systematic literature review.社会决定因素对预防和健康促进服务利用的影响:一项系统文献综述的结果
Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/psm000085. Epub 2012 Oct 25.