• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项焦点小组评估,以确定基于大学的工作场所健康计划的动机、障碍和有效性。

A focus group assessment to determine motivations, barriers and effectiveness of a university-based worksite wellness program.

作者信息

Hill-Mey Patricia E, Merrill Ray M, Kumpfer Karol L, Reel Justine, Hyatt-Neville Beverly

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion & Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Department of Health Science, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Perspect. 2013 Dec 31;3(2):154-64. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2013.019. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.5681/hpp.2013.019
PMID:24688965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3963663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study explores university employee perceptions and under-standing about its Worksite Health Promotion Program (WHPP). The WHPP included a Health Risk Appraisal (HRA), biometric screening, publicity for on-campus health programs and facilities, and health coaching.

METHODS

A qualitative design was used based on a grounded theory ap-proach. Four 90 minutes focus groups with 6-8 participants in each were conducted within a two 2 week period among employees, representing fac-ulty/participants, fac-ulty/nonparticipants, staff/participants, and staff/nonparticipants. Responses to questions about motivations, barriers, and perceived health benefits that impacted participation in the WHPP were digi-tally recorded, transcribed and coded for themes.

RESULTS

Incentives effectively motivated participation. Biometric screening had the largest impact on behavior change, followed by the information learned from the HRA. However, despite two-thirds of the employees partici-pating in the pro-gram, lack of a full understanding of WHPP benefits and services lowered partici-pation in follow-up services and supplemental pro-grams.

CONCLUSIONS

Biometric screening and HRAs effectively motivate program par-ticipation. Communication of benefits and services are important when providing WHPPs.

摘要

背景

本研究探讨了大学员工对其工作场所健康促进计划(WHPP)的看法和理解。该WHPP包括健康风险评估(HRA)、生物特征筛查、校内健康计划和设施的宣传以及健康指导。

方法

采用基于扎根理论方法的定性设计。在两周内对员工进行了四个90分钟的焦点小组讨论,每个小组有6 - 8名参与者,分别代表教师/参与者、教师/非参与者、工作人员/参与者和工作人员/非参与者。对有关影响参与WHPP的动机、障碍和感知健康益处的问题的回答进行了数字记录、转录并编码以找出主题。

结果

激励措施有效地促进了参与。生物特征筛查对行为改变的影响最大,其次是从HRA中学到的信息。然而,尽管三分之二的员工参与了该计划,但对WHPP益处和服务缺乏充分了解降低了对后续服务和补充计划的参与度。

结论

生物特征筛查和HRA有效地促进了计划参与。在提供WHPP时,福利和服务的沟通很重要。

相似文献

1
A focus group assessment to determine motivations, barriers and effectiveness of a university-based worksite wellness program.一项焦点小组评估,以确定基于大学的工作场所健康计划的动机、障碍和有效性。
Health Promot Perspect. 2013 Dec 31;3(2):154-64. doi: 10.5681/hpp.2013.019. eCollection 2013.
2
Factors Associated With Participation in a University Worksite Wellness Program.与参与大学工作场所健康计划相关的因素。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.01.028. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
3
Attendance barriers experienced by female health care workers voluntarily participating in a multi-component health promotion programme at the workplace.女性医护人员参与工作场所多组分健康促进计划时遇到的出勤障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):1340. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6254-3.
4
Do worksite health promotion programs (WHPP) influence presenteeism among employees? A systematic review1.工作场所健康促进计划(WHPP)是否会影响员工的出勤?一项系统评价¹。
Work. 2024;77(1):85-102. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220115.
5
Employee Sleep Enhancement and Fatigue Reduction Programs: Analysis of the 2017 CDC Workplace Health in America Poll.员工睡眠改善和疲劳缓解计划:2017 年美国疾病预防控制中心职场健康调查分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 May;35(4):503-513. doi: 10.1177/0890117120969091. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Barriers to participation in a worksite wellness program.参与工作场所健康计划的障碍。
Nutr Res Pract. 2010 Apr;4(2):149-54. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.2.149. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
7
Wellness Program Nonparticipation and Its Association With Employee Turnover.健康计划参与度与员工离职率的关系。
Am J Health Promot. 2020 Jun;34(5):559-562. doi: 10.1177/0890117120907867. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Health-risk appraisal with or without disease management for worksite cardiovascular risk reduction.为降低工作场所心血管疾病风险而进行的健康风险评估(无论是否进行疾病管理)。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(6):513-8. doi: 10.1097/01.JCN.0000338933.81587.b4.
9
Rationale for participation in university worksite wellness programs.参与大学工作场所健康计划的基本原理。
J Am Coll Health. 2024 Dec;72(9):3348-3356. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2155827. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Perceptions of employees with a low and medium level of education towards workplace health promotion programmes: a mixed-methods study.受教育程度较低和中等的员工对工作场所健康促进计划的看法:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):1617. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13976-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Physical Activity Adherence in Male Office Workers Based on Self-Determination Theory: The Mediating Effects of Psychological Need Satisfaction and Autonomous Motivation.基于自我决定理论探讨影响男性上班族身体活动坚持性的因素:心理需求满足与自主动机的中介作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 30;13(15):1852. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151852.
2
A Representative Analysis of Nonparticipation in Workplace Health Promotion in Germany Using Multivariable Methods.运用多变量方法对德国职场健康促进中不参与情况的代表性分析。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Dec 5;69:1607261. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607261. eCollection 2024.
3
Medical students' perspectives on a longitudinal wellness curriculum: a qualitative investigation.医学生对纵向健康课程的看法:一项定性研究。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Jul 12;15(3):26-36. doi: 10.36834/cmej.77833. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Workplace Physical Activity Barriers and Facilitators: A Qualitative Study Based on Employees Physical Activity Levels.工作场所体力活动障碍和促进因素:基于员工体力活动水平的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;19(15):9442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159442.
5
Employee Perspectives on Onsite Health Clinics in Semiconductor Company in South Korea.韩国半导体公司内部医疗诊所员工观点调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1433. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031433.
6
Putting the National Diabetes Prevention Program to Work: Predictors of Achieving Weight-Loss Goals in an Employee Population.实施国家糖尿病预防计划:员工人群实现减肥目标的预测因素。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2019 Sep 12;16:E125. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190053.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-rated job performance and absenteeism according to employee engagement, health behaviors, and physical health.根据员工敬业度、健康行为和身体健康状况自评的工作绩效和缺勤率。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Jan;55(1):10-8. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31827b73af.
2
Presenteeism according to healthy behaviors, physical health, and work environment.根据健康行为、身体健康和工作环境来看待出勤主义。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Oct;15(5):293-301. doi: 10.1089/pop.2012.0003. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
3
Lowering employee health care costs through the Healthy Lifestyle Incentive Program.通过健康生活方式激励计划降低员工医疗保健成本。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2011 May-Jun;17(3):225-32. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181f54128.
4
Management support of workplace health promotion: field test of the leading by example tool.管理支持工作场所健康促进:以身作则工具的现场测试。
Am J Health Promot. 2010 Nov-Dec;25(2):138-46. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.080930-QUAN-225.
5
Health behaviors of adults: United States, 2005-2007.2005 - 2007年美国成年人的健康行为
Vital Health Stat 10. 2010 Mar(245):1-132.
6
Employee weight management through health coaching.通过健康指导进行员工体重管理。
Eat Weight Disord. 2010 Mar-Jun;15(1-2):e52-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03325280.
7
Barriers to participation in a worksite wellness program.参与工作场所健康计划的障碍。
Nutr Res Pract. 2010 Apr;4(2):149-54. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.2.149. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
8
Ranking 37th--measuring the performance of the U.S. health care system.排名第37位——衡量美国医疗保健系统的绩效。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 14;362(2):98-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0910064. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
9
Health risk appraisals: how much do they influence employees' health behavior?健康风险评估:它们对员工的健康行为有多大影响?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Sep-Oct;28(5):1532-40. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.5.1532.
10
Efficacy of the Berkshire Health System Cardiovascular Health Risk Reduction Program.伯克希尔医疗系统心血管健康风险降低计划的疗效
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Sep;51(9):1024-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181b11bb3.