Runkle Anne P, Feliu Marianela, Lo Charmaine B, Way David P, Mitzman Jennifer
Department of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State University College of Medicine Columbus Ohio USA.
Division of Emergency Medicine Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Dec 19;8(6):e11051. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11051. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellowship directors can interview candidates from either pediatric or EM residency programs. Currently, most candidates are pediatricians; however, because emergency physicians have attributes that could benefit PEM, our goal was to investigate facilitators and barriers to training more of them to become PEM physicians.
We surveyed U.S. PEM fellowship program directors (PDs) about their program's recruitment practices: Do they recruit only pediatricians or mostly pediatricians with an occasional emergency physician or do they actively recruit both? We solicited volunteers from each recruitment group for interviews. These were recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded using summative content analysis. Comments were cataloged into themes that were philosophical or logistic in nature and those that might facilitate (drivers) or serve as barriers (restrainers) to the inclusion of emergency physicians in PEM.
We received 50 of 86 (58%) survey responses, 29 (34%) of whom volunteered for interviews. The 17 volunteers we selected for interviews generated 13 themes that fell into the four major theme categories: four philosophical drivers, three logistic drivers, two philosophical restrainers, and four logistic restrainers. Program groups differed with regard to the inclusion of emergency physicians. Most limiting were the impact of variable program length and the implicit belief that pediatricians are best suited to treat children. Most beneficial is the recognized value of EM graduates to the field of PEM.
While PDs acknowledged a growing need for PEM physicians, particularly in community hospitals, and that emergency physicians would contribute to PEM, they also identified the logistical burden of including them in programs primarily designed for pediatricians. This burden involves maintaining separate curricula for EM graduates and finding emergency physician faculty to serve as mentors. PDs also expressed a desire for resources to guide the integration of more emergency physicians into their programs.
儿科急诊医学(PEM)专科培训项目主任可以面试来自儿科或急诊医学住院医师培训项目的候选人。目前,大多数候选人是儿科医生;然而,由于急诊医生具备的特质可能有益于儿科急诊医学,我们的目标是调查促使更多急诊医生接受培训成为儿科急诊医学医生的促进因素和障碍。
我们就其项目的招聘做法对美国儿科急诊医学专科培训项目主任进行了调查:他们是只招聘儿科医生,还是主要招聘儿科医生,偶尔招聘急诊医生,或者他们积极招聘这两类医生?我们从每个招聘组征集志愿者进行访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用总结性内容分析进行主题编码。评论被归类为本质上是哲学或后勤方面的主题,以及那些可能促进(驱动因素)或阻碍(限制因素)急诊医生纳入儿科急诊医学的主题。
我们收到了86份调查问卷中的50份(58%)回复,其中29份(34%)自愿接受访谈。我们挑选的17名志愿者访谈产生了13个主题,这些主题分为四大类:四个哲学驱动因素、三个后勤驱动因素、两个哲学限制因素和四个后勤限制因素。各项目组在急诊医生的纳入方面存在差异。最具限制作用的是项目时长可变的影响以及认为儿科医生最适合治疗儿童的固有观念。最有益的是急诊医学毕业生对儿科急诊医学领域的公认价值。
虽然项目主任承认对儿科急诊医学医生的需求日益增长,特别是在社区医院,并且急诊医生会对儿科急诊医学有所贡献,但他们也指出将急诊医生纳入主要为儿科医生设计的项目存在后勤负担。这种负担包括为急诊医学毕业生维持单独的课程,以及寻找急诊医生教员担任导师。项目主任还表示希望获得资源来指导将更多急诊医生纳入他们的项目。