König Alexandra, Schwittek Jessica, Jendrzey Katarzyna
University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Front Sociol. 2024 Dec 5;9:1470541. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541. eCollection 2024.
In public debates, transnational families are portrayed as a deviation from the norm of "good childhood." In Europe, this is emphasized by the term "Euro-orphans," branding parents' (especially mothers') absence as a violation and scandalizing it. Children's voices are rarely heard in public discourse, and although research is now turning its attention to the "stayer children," they and their perspectives on transnational family life remain underrepresented, especially in Europe. In a German-Polish project, we investigate how children perceive and evaluate transnational family life based on 27 group discussions with 12-14-year-olds (with and without own transnational family experience) in Poland. The analysis shows that (1) the presence of parents is central to the normative pattern of a good childhood from children's perspective, but (2) they use differentiated criteria when assessing (temporary) parental migration, i.e., they do not refer to "universal" needs of children. Additionally, (3) children request that they be informed about the migration-decision early on and involved in the organization of the time of separation to make it as acceptable as possible for them. Thereby, they offer interpretations of transnational families that contribute to erode the norm of good childhood. We see our paper as a sociologically and socio-politically relevant contribution to expanding the discussion on transnational families, both from the perspective of children who discuss and problematize transnational family life as more than merely a question of violating the norm of parents' presence, and with our focus on the European region, which provides specific contextual conditions for transnational families.
在公开辩论中,跨国家庭被描绘成偏离“美好童年”规范的存在。在欧洲,“欧洲孤儿”这一术语强化了这种观点,将父母(尤其是母亲)的缺席视为一种违规行为并加以丑化。在公共话语中,儿童的声音很少被听到,尽管如今研究已开始关注“留守子女”,但他们以及他们对跨国家庭生活的看法在研究中所占比重仍然很低,在欧洲尤其如此。在一个德波项目中,我们基于在波兰与12至14岁儿童(有或没有跨国家庭经历)进行的27次小组讨论,调查孩子们如何看待和评价跨国家庭生活。分析表明:(1)从孩子们的角度来看,父母的陪伴是美好童年规范模式的核心;但(2)他们在评估(临时)父母移民时使用了不同的标准,也就是说,他们并非提及儿童的“普遍”需求;此外,(3)孩子们要求尽早被告知移民决定,并参与分离时期的安排,以使分离对他们来说尽可能易于接受。由此,他们对跨国家庭的解读有助于打破美好童年的规范。我们认为我们的论文在社会学和社会政治层面具有相关性,有助于拓展关于跨国家庭的讨论,这不仅是从那些将跨国家庭生活视为不仅仅是违反父母陪伴规范问题的孩子们的角度,也是从我们聚焦于为跨国家庭提供特定背景条件的欧洲地区的角度。