Suppr超能文献

射血分数降低且存在电不同步的心力衰竭患者中传导系统起搏与双心室起搏的比较

Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony.

作者信息

Ammar Ahmed, Elewa Ahmed, Emam Amr Y, Sharief Mohamed, Kamel Omnia

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, United Kingdom.

Cardiology Department, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 5;11:1495689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1495689. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Biventricular pacing (BiVP) has been the cornerstone of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the management of symptomatic heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and electrical dyssynchrony despite guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). However, BiVP has some limitations, including technical difficulties and high non-response rates. Conduction system pacing encompassing His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently emerged as a promising alternative to CRT in this group of patients. In this review, we explore the current evidence, guidelines, limitations, gaps in knowledge, and ongoing trials comparing CSP and BiVP for the management of HFrEF with electrical dyssynchrony.

摘要

双心室起搏(BiVP)一直是心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的基石,用于治疗尽管接受了指南指导的药物治疗(GDMT)但仍有症状的射血分数降低(HFrEF)和电不同步的心力衰竭患者。然而,BiVP存在一些局限性,包括技术困难和高无反应率。包括希氏束起搏(HBP)和左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)在内的传导系统起搏最近已成为这组患者中CRT的一种有前景的替代方法。在本综述中,我们探讨了目前关于比较传导系统起搏(CSP)和BiVP治疗伴有电不同步的HFrEF的证据、指南、局限性、知识空白以及正在进行的试验。

相似文献

3
Conduction System Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.心脏再同步治疗的传导系统起搏
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023 Oct 31;10(11):448. doi: 10.3390/jcdd10110448.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验