Kumar Sunny, Mehra Saurabh, Sircar Mrinal, Jha Onkar, Gupta Rajesh, Sinha Seema, Kaur Ravneet
Department of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Fortis Hospital, Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Paras HEC Hospital, Ranchi.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2024 Dec 20. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2024.3050.
Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) is one of the treatment modalities used for COVID-19. Initial smaller studies showed the usefulness of CPT in COVID-19, but larger studies showed that it is not effective. This is a retrospective observational study conducted between 1st June 2020 and 31st July 2021 at a tertiary hospital in Noida, India. Our analysis was done on 213 COVID-19 patients, comprising 170 cases who were given convalescent plasma and 43 controls who did not get CPT. Outcomes analyzed were improvement in PaO2:FiO2 ratio (PFR) by day 5 of CPT, 28-day mortality, and level of inflammatory markers. Mean PFR before plasma transfusion was comparable between CPT and control groups (142.11±73.99 vs. 151.11±88.87, p=0.56). There was no significant difference in mean PFR after 5 days of CPT between cases and the control group (187.02±102.34 vs. 160.29±83.39, p=0.206). 28-day mortality was 47.05% in the CPT group and 37.20% in the control group (p=0.246). Mortality amongst the subgroup of patients on invasive mechanical ventilation was 89.74% in cases and 80% in controls (p=0.518). No significant difference was found in levels of serum ferritin, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein between the two groups. Convalescent plasma does not have a significant effect on day 5 PFR and 28-day mortality. Our study could not find any subgroup of patients who would benefit from CPT. This study reinforces that CPT does not benefit moderate to severe patients with COVID-19.
恢复期血浆疗法(CPT)是用于治疗新冠肺炎的方法之一。最初的一些小型研究显示CPT对新冠肺炎有效,但大型研究表明其并无效果。这是一项于2020年6月1日至2021年7月31日在印度诺伊达一家三级医院开展的回顾性观察研究。我们对213例新冠肺炎患者进行了分析,其中170例接受了恢复期血浆治疗,43例作为未接受CPT的对照组。分析的结果指标包括CPT治疗第5天时动脉血氧分压与吸入氧浓度比值(PFR)的改善情况、28天死亡率以及炎症标志物水平。血浆输注前,CPT组和对照组的平均PFR相当(142.11±73.99 vs. 151.11±88.87,p = 0.56)。CPT治疗5天后,病例组和对照组的平均PFR无显著差异(187.02±102.34 vs. 160.29±83.39,p = 0.206)。CPT组的28天死亡率为47.05%,对照组为37.20%(p = 0.246)。有创机械通气患者亚组中,病例组的死亡率为89.74%,对照组为80%(p = 0.518)。两组之间血清铁蛋白、白细胞介素-6和C反应蛋白水平无显著差异。恢复期血浆对第5天的PFR和28天死亡率无显著影响。我们的研究未发现任何能从CPT中获益的患者亚组。该研究进一步证实CPT对中度至重度新冠肺炎患者并无益处。