Suppr超能文献

女性尿失禁盆底肌肉训练方法的比较。

Comparisons of approaches to pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women.

作者信息

Hay-Smith E Jean C, Starzec-Proserpio Małgorzata, Moller Brittany, Aldabe Daniela, Cacciari Licia, Pitangui Ana Carolina R, Vesentini Giovana, Woodley Stephanie J, Dumoulin Chantale, Frawley Helena C, Jorge Cristine H, Morin Mélanie, Wallace Sheila A, Weatherall Mark

机构信息

Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Midwifery, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD009508. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009508.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a recommended treatment for female stress, urgency, and mixed urinary incontinence. Training varies in exercise type (pelvic floor muscles contracting with and without other muscles), dose, and delivery (e.g. amount and type of supervision).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of alternative approaches (exercise type, dose, and delivery) to pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the management of urinary incontinence (stress, urgency, and mixed) in women.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Specialised Register (searched 27 September 2023; which contains CENTRAL, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization ICTRP), handsearched journals and conference proceedings, and reviewed reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, quasi-randomised, or cluster-randomised trials in female stress, urge, or mixed urinary incontinence where one trial arm included PFMT and another was an alternative approach to PFMT type, dose, or intervention delivery. We excluded studies with participants with neurological conditions or pregnant or recently postpartum.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and methodological quality using the Cochrane RoB 1 tool. We extracted and cross-checked data and resolved disagreements by discussion. Data processing was as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6). Synthesis was completed in intervention subgroups.

MAIN RESULTS

This is a review update. The analysis included 63 trials with 4920 women; the previous version included 21 trials with 1490 women. Samples sizes ranged from 11 to 362. Overall, study participants were mid-age (45 to 65 years) parous women with stress or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (46 trials), who had no prior incontinence treatment or pelvic surgery, or appreciable pelvic floor dysfunction. Trials were conducted in countries around the world, mostly in middle- or high-income settings (53 trials). All trials had one or more arms using 'direct' PFMT, defined as repeated, isolated, voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions. Trials were categorised as comparisons of exercise type (27 trials, 3 subgroups), dose (11 trials, 5 subgroups, 1 with no data), and delivery (25 trials, 5 subgroups). Incontinence quality of life data are reported here as the primary outcome. Adverse event data were summarised narratively. Comparison 1: exercise type Co-ordinated training (body movements with concurrent pelvic floor muscle contraction) versus direct PFMT Co-ordinated training may slightly improve quality of life (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.44 to -0.01; I = 81%; 8 trials, 356 women; low-certainty evidence). Indirect training (exercises that are not contractions of the pelvic floor muscles) versus direct PFMT Direct PFMT may moderately improve quality of life (SMD 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.02; I = 78%; 4 trials, 170 women; low-certainty evidence). Indirect training combined with direct PFMT versus direct PFMT Combining indirect training with direct PFMT may make little to no difference in quality of life (SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.10; I = 33; 7 trials, 482 women; low-certainty evidence). Comparison 2: exercise dose PFMT with resistance device versus PFMT without resistance device PFMT without a resistance device may slightly improve incontinence quality of life, but the evidence is very uncertain (SMD 0.22, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.48; I = 32%; 3 trials, 227 women; very low-certainty evidence). Maximal pelvic floor muscle contractions versus submaximal pelvic floor muscle contractions No data reported. PFMT more days per week versus PFMT fewer days per week PFMT more days per week may greatly improve incontinence quality of life (SMD -1.60, 95% CI -2.15 to -1.05; 1 trial, 68 women; low-certainty evidence). PFMT in upright body positions versus PFMT when lying down No data reported. Comparison 3: exercise intervention delivery PFMT supervised in clinic versus PFMT at home Clinic supervision may slightly improve incontinence quality of life, but the evidence is very uncertain (SMD -0.30, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.05; I = 89%; 3 trials, 137 women; very low-certainty evidence). More clinician contact for PFMT supervision versus less clinician contact No usable data reported. Individual supervision of PFMT versus group supervision Individually supervised PFMT probably results in little to no difference in quality of life (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.35 to -0.01; I = 0%; 5 trials, 544 women; moderate-certainty evidence). PFMT supervised in clinic versus supervision using e-health (mobile app communication with clinicians) Clinic supervision may make little to no difference in incontinence quality of life, but the evidence is very uncertain (SMD -0.11, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.19; 1 trial, 173 women; very low-certainty evidence). PFMT instruction delivered via e-health versus written instruction E-health delivery may slightly improve quality of life (SMD -0.21, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.01; I = 25%; 3 studies, 318 women; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events Nine trials collected adverse event data; 66/1083 (6%) women had an adverse event. Almost all events were associated with use of an intravaginal or intrarectal training device. The adverse events were vaginal discharge, spotting, or discomfort. Limitations in the evidence Four main factors influenced our certainty in the evidence: 44 trials were at unclear or high risk of selection bias; data were sparse in some subgroups with few trials, trials that did not measure outcomes of interest, or did not report usable data; results were inconsistent; and many trials were small (imprecise).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there is low- to moderate-certainty evidence that some approaches to PFMT are better than others, for some there was little or no difference. The 7th International Consultation on Incontinence recommends PFMT as first-line therapy for women with urinary incontinence. Direct PFMT (sets of repeated, isolated, voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions) may result in a small improvement in incontinence quality of life compared to indirect training. In terms of improved quality of life, PFMT can be supervised individually or in a group because it probably makes little to no difference in achieving this outcome. Many comparisons had low- or very low-certainty evidence, often because there was only one trial or several small trials with methodological limitations. More, better designed and reported trials, directly comparing PFMT approaches are needed, especially trials investigating exercise dose.

摘要

背景

盆底肌训练(PFMT)是女性压力性、急迫性和混合性尿失禁的推荐治疗方法。训练在运动类型(盆底肌与其他肌肉一起或不与其他肌肉一起收缩)、剂量和实施方式(如监督的数量和类型)方面存在差异。

目的

评估盆底肌训练(PFMT)的替代方法(运动类型、剂量和实施方式)对女性尿失禁(压力性、急迫性和混合性)管理的效果。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane尿失禁专业注册库(2023年9月27日检索;其中包含CENTRAL、MEDLINE、ClinicalTrials.gov和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台),手工检索了期刊和会议论文集,并查阅了相关文章的参考文献列表。

入选标准

女性压力性、急迫性或混合性尿失禁的随机、半随机或整群随机试验,其中一个试验组包括PFMT,另一个是PFMT类型、剂量或干预实施方式的替代方法。我们排除了患有神经系统疾病、怀孕或近期产后的参与者的研究。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者使用Cochrane偏倚风险1工具独立评估试验的纳入资格和方法学质量。我们提取并交叉核对数据,并通过讨论解决分歧。数据处理按照《Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册》(第6版)中的描述进行。在干预亚组中完成了综合分析。

主要结果

这是一次综述更新。分析纳入了63项试验,共4920名女性;上一版纳入了21项试验,共1490名女性。样本量从11到362不等。总体而言,研究参与者为中年(45至65岁)经产妇,患有压力性或以压力性为主的混合性尿失禁(46项试验),她们之前没有接受过尿失禁治疗或盆腔手术,也没有明显的盆底功能障碍。试验在世界各地的国家进行,大多在中高收入环境中(53项试验)。所有试验都有一个或多个使用“直接”PFMT的组,“直接”PFMT定义为重复、孤立、自主的盆底肌收缩。试验分为运动类型比较(27项试验,3个亚组)、剂量比较(11项试验,5个亚组,1个无数据)和实施方式比较(25项试验,5个亚组)。这里将尿失禁生活质量数据作为主要结局报告。不良事件数据进行了描述性总结。比较1:运动类型 协调性训练(身体运动同时进行盆底肌收缩)与直接PFMT 协调性训练可能会略微改善生活质量(标准化均数差(SMD)-0.22,95%置信区间(CI)-0.44至-0.01;I² = 81%;8项试验,356名女性;低确定性证据)。间接训练(非盆底肌收缩的运动)与直接PFMT 直接PFMT可能会适度改善生活质量(SMD 0.70,95%CI 0.38至1.02;I² = 78%;4项试验,170名女性;低确定性证据)。间接训练与直接PFMT联合使用与直接PFMT 间接训练与直接PFMT联合使用对生活质量的影响可能很小或没有差异(SMD -0.08,95%CI -0.26至0.10;I² = 33%;7项试验,482名女性;低确定性证据)。比较2:运动剂量 使用阻力装置的PFMT与不使用阻力装置的PFMT 不使用阻力装置的PFMT可能会略微改善尿失禁生活质量,但证据非常不确定(SMD 0.22,95%CI -0.04至0.48;I² = 32%;3项试验,227名女性;极低确定性证据)。最大盆底肌收缩与次最大盆底肌收缩 未报告数据。每周进行更多天数的PFMT与每周进行较少天数的PFMT 每周进行更多天数的PFMT可能会极大地改善尿失禁生活质量(SMD -1.60,95%CI -2.15至-1.05;1项试验,68名女性;低确定性证据)。站立位进行PFMT与卧位进行PFMT 未报告数据。比较3:运动干预实施方式 在诊所监督下进行的PFMT与在家中进行的PFMT 诊所监督可能会略微改善尿失禁生活质量,但证据非常不确定(SMD -0.30,95%CI -0.65至0.05;I² = 89%;3项试验,137名女性;极低确定性证据)。PFMT监督中更多的临床医生接触与更少的临床医生接触 未报告可用数据。PFMT的个体监督与小组监督 个体监督的PFMT对生活质量的影响可能很小或没有差异(SMD -0.18,95%CI -0.35至-0.01;I² = 0%;5项试验,544名女性;中等确定性证据)。在诊所监督下进行的PFMT与使用电子健康(与临床医生进行移动应用程序通信)进行的监督 在诊所监督下进行的PFMT对尿失禁生活质量的影响可能很小或没有差异,但证据非常不确定(SMD -0.11,95%CI -0.41至0.19;1项试验,173名女性;极低确定性证据)。通过电子健康进行的PFMT指导与书面指导 电子健康指导可能会略微改善生活质量(SMD -0.21,95%CI -0.43至0.01;I² = 25%;3项研究,318名女性;低确定性证据)。不良事件 九项试验收集了不良事件数据;66/1083(6%)名女性发生了不良事件。几乎所有事件都与使用阴道或直肠内训练装置有关。不良事件为阴道分泌物、点滴出血或不适。证据的局限性 四个主要因素影响了我们对证据的确定性:44项试验存在选择偏倚的不明确或高风险;一些亚组的数据稀少,试验数量少、未测量感兴趣的结局或未报告可用数据;结果不一致;许多试验规模小(不精确)。

作者结论

尽管有低至中等确定性的证据表明某些PFMT方法优于其他方法,但对于某些方法,差异很小或没有差异。第7届国际尿失禁咨询会议推荐PFMT作为女性尿失禁的一线治疗方法。与间接训练相比,直接PFMT(一组组重复、孤立、自主的盆底肌收缩)可能会使尿失禁生活质量略有改善。就改善生活质量而言,PFMT可以进行个体监督或小组监督,因为在实现这一结局方面可能差异很小或没有差异。许多比较的证据确定性低或非常低,通常是因为只有一项试验或几项存在方法学局限性的小型试验。需要更多设计更好且报告完善的试验,直接比较PFMT方法,尤其是研究运动剂量的试验。

相似文献

7
Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery.前列腺手术后尿失禁的保守治疗干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 18;4(4):CD014799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014799.pub2.

本文引用的文献

8
GRADE guidance 36: updates to GRADE's approach to addressing inconsistency.GRADE 指南 36:更新 GRADE 解决不一致性的方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验