Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
PM R. 2024 May;16(5):485-495. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13078. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
There is little evidence regarding the effect of trunk-stabilizing muscle training on the improvement of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms.
To investigate the effect of trunk-stabilizing muscle training on transabdominal ultrasonography (TAUS) and clinical urological indices, and on the quality of life (QoL) in women with SUI.
Randomized controlled trial.
A university hospital.
Forty-six women with SUI, ages 20-55 years, were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 23) and control group (n = 23).
The experimental group performed trunk-stabilization exercises according to the Sapsford protocol, whereas the control group performed pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercises for 8 weeks.
The primary outcome measure was bladder base displacement (BBD), assessed by TAUS during PFM contraction (PFMC), Valsalva, and abdominal curl. The secondary outcome measures were PFM strength, the severity of urinary incontinence (UI), voiding diary, and QoL, assessed by the Modified Oxford Grading System, the severity index, frequency chart, and lower urinary tract symptoms-QoL questionnaire, respectively. All variables were assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks of intervention.
The interaction of group and time was not significant for BBD during PFMC (p = .98), Valsalva (p = .28), abdominal curl (p = .34), and secondary variables (p > .05). The main effect of time was significant in both groups for BBD during PFMC, PFM strength, the severity of UI, voiding diary, and QoL (p < .001), with effect size (d) of 0.30, 0.80, 2.05, 1.07, and 1.03 in the control; and 0.49, 0.52, 1.75, 0.66, and 0.88 in the experimental group, respectively. The main effect of the group was not significant for BBD during PFMC (p = .68), Valsalva (p = .22), abdominal curl (p = .53), and secondary variables (p > .05).
Trunk-stabilizing muscle training and PFM exercise are equally effective in the improvement of PFM function, UI symptoms, and QoL in women with SUI. Both methods can be used interchangeably by physical therapists.
关于躯干稳定肌训练对改善压力性尿失禁(SUI)症状的影响,目前相关证据较少。
探讨躯干稳定肌训练对经腹超声(TAUS)和临床泌尿科指标,以及对 SUI 女性生活质量(QoL)的影响。
随机对照试验。
一所大学医院。
46 名年龄在 20-55 岁之间的 SUI 女性被随机分为实验组(n=23)和对照组(n=23)。
实验组根据 Sapsford 方案进行躯干稳定训练,对照组则进行 8 周的骨盆底肌肉(PFM)训练。
主要结局测量指标为 TAUS 评估的膀胱底位移(BBD),包括 PFM 收缩(PFMC)、Valsalva 动作和腹部卷曲时的 BBD。次要结局测量指标包括 PFM 力量、尿失禁严重程度、排尿日记和 QoL,分别采用改良牛津分级系统、严重程度指数、频数图表和下尿路症状-QoL 问卷进行评估。所有变量均在基线和干预 8 周后进行评估。
组间和时间的交互作用在 PFMC 时的 BBD (p=0.98)、Valsalva 动作时(p=0.28)、腹部卷曲时(p=0.34)和次要变量时(p>0.05)均无统计学意义。两组在 PFMC 时的 BBD、PFM 力量、UI 严重程度、排尿日记和 QoL 方面的时间主效应均有显著差异(p<0.001),对照组的效应量(d)分别为 0.30、0.80、2.05、1.07 和 1.03,实验组分别为 0.49、0.52、1.75、0.66 和 0.88。PFMC 时的 BBD(p=0.68)、Valsalva 动作时(p=0.22)、腹部卷曲时(p=0.53)和次要变量时(p>0.05)的组间主效应均无统计学意义。
躯干稳定肌训练和 PFM 运动在改善 SUI 女性的 PFM 功能、UI 症状和 QoL 方面同样有效。物理治疗师可以交替使用这两种方法。