Johnston Peter W, Vieira Rute, Cameron Isobel M, Kumwenda Ben, Walker Kim A, Cleland Jennifer A
NHS Education for Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Centre for Healthcare Education Research and Innovation (CHERI), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Room 2:040, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2025 Feb;30(1):53-68. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10406-3. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Big datasets and data analytics enable granular analyses examining group differences in performance. Our focus is on differential attainment (DA) in postgraduate College (Board) examinations. We asked: Are candidates' sociodemographic characteristics associated with performance on the UK's Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (MRCP) Part 1 after adjusting for medical school performance (MSP) and type of medical programme? This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of 6040 medical graduates with linked sociodemographic data in the UK Medical Education Database qualifying from a UK medical school (2012-2014) and sitting MRCP Part 1 before October 2019. Chi-squared tests established univariable associations with MRCP performance (pass/fail first sitting MRCP Part 1). Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression identified independent explanatory factors of success, adjusted for medical school. The odds (95% CI) of passing MRCP Part 1 exams on first sitting were greater for men (OR = 1.61, CI 1.42-1.81, p < 0.001) and those on a graduate entry programme (OR = 1.44, 1.05-1.99, p < 0.001). The odds of passing were lower as age increases (OR = 0.87, 0.85-0.90, p < 0.001), for minority ethnic (OR = 0.61, CI 0.53-0.7, p < 0.001), and gateway to medicine (OR = 0.49, CI 0.27-0.90, p = 0.02) candidates. After adjusting for MSP, odds were greater for passing in men (OR = 1.62, CI 1.24-2.11, p < 0.001) and candidates with higher MSP (OR = 4.12, CI 3.40-4.96, p < 0.001). Our findings illustrate how performance on MRCP part 1 is associated with group-level social and educational factors. This DA may be due to aspects of the assessment itself, and/or the persistent nature of social and educational disadvantage.
大型数据集和数据分析能够进行细致的分析,以检验不同群体在表现上的差异。我们关注的是研究生学院(委员会)考试中的成绩差异(DA)。我们提出了这样一个问题:在对医学院校成绩(MSP)和医学课程类型进行调整之后,考生的社会人口学特征是否与英国皇家内科医学院(MRCP)第一部分考试的成绩相关?这是一项回顾性纵向队列研究,研究对象为6040名医学毕业生,他们在英国医学教育数据库中拥有相关的社会人口学数据,这些毕业生于2012年至2014年从英国医学院校毕业,并在2019年10月之前参加了MRCP第一部分考试。卡方检验确定了与MRCP成绩(首次参加MRCP第一部分考试通过/未通过)的单变量关联。多变量混合效应逻辑回归确定了成功的独立解释因素,并对医学院校进行了调整。首次参加考试通过MRCP第一部分考试的几率(95%置信区间),男性更高(优势比[OR]=1.61,置信区间1.42 - 1.81,p<0.001),以及那些参加研究生入学课程的人更高(OR = 1.44,1.05 - 1.99,p<0.001)。随着年龄增长,通过的几率更低(OR = 0.87,0.85 - 0.90,p<0.001),少数族裔(OR = 0.61,置信区间0.53 - 0.7,p<0.001),以及医学预科生(OR = 0.49,置信区间0.27 - 0.90,p = 0.02)的考生也是如此。在对MSP进行调整之后,男性通过考试的几率更高(OR = 1.62,置信区间1.24 - 2.11,p<0.001),以及MSP更高的考生也是如此(OR = 4.12,置信区间3.40 - 4.96,p<0.001)。我们的研究结果说明了MRCP第一部分的成绩是如何与群体层面的社会和教育因素相关联的。这种成绩差异可能是由于评估本身的某些方面,和/或社会及教育劣势的持续性。