Moore Andrew, Bidonde Julia, Fisher Emma, Häuser Winfried, Bell Rae Frances, Perrot Serge, Makri Souzi, Straube Sebastian
Newton Ferrers, Plymouth, UK.
School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 May 1;64(5):2385-2394. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae707.
To summarize and evaluate Cochrane reviews of pharmacological therapies for adults with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) pain.
Systematic search of Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to May 2024. Generic quality assessment used AMSTAR-2 criteria, validity checks of potentially critical factors in evaluation of analgesic efficacy and assessment of susceptibility of results to publication bias. Pain outcomes were participant-reported pain relief of ≥30% or ≥50%, or PGIC much or very much improved.
Twenty-one reviews (87 trials, 17 631 patients) were included. All rated moderate (15) or high-quality (6) using AMSTAR-2 and at least seven of eight critical pain criteria were met by 13 of 21 reviews. Diagnosis of FMS used recognized criteria. Seven reviews found no trials (carbamazepine, clonazepam, lamotrigine, phenytoin, oxycodone, topiramate or valproate), seven had limited and inadequate data (antipsychotics, cannabinoids, combination therapy, gabapentin, lacosamide, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, NSAIDs) and two were subject to publication bias (amitriptyline, SSRI). Mirtazapine had moderate evidence of no effect. Duloxetine, milnacipran and pregabalin had moderate/good evidence of substantial pain relief for 4-12 weeks in around 1 in 10 adults with moderate or severe FMS pain, without evidence of efficacy beyond six months. Serious adverse events were no more common than with placebo. There was no evidence about who might benefit or experience adverse events. There was no substantial efficacy evidence for other medicines.
Duloxetine, milnacipran and pregabalin had good evidence that about 1 person in 10 with moderate or severe pain experienced pain intensity reduction by at least 50%.
总结并评估Cochrane系统评价中针对成人纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)疼痛的药物治疗。
系统检索至2024年5月的Cochrane系统评价数据库。采用AMSTAR-2标准进行一般质量评估,对评估镇痛效果的潜在关键因素进行有效性检查,并评估结果受发表偏倚影响的敏感性。疼痛结局为参与者报告疼痛缓解≥30%或≥50%,或患者整体印象变化量表(PGIC)显著或非常显著改善。
纳入21项系统评价(87项试验,17631例患者)。根据AMSTAR-2标准,所有评价均为中等质量(15项)或高质量(6项),21项评价中有13项至少满足八项关键疼痛标准中的七项。FMS的诊断采用公认标准。七项评价未找到相关试验(卡马西平、氯硝西泮、拉莫三嗪、苯妥英、羟考酮、托吡酯或丙戊酸盐),七项数据有限且不充分(抗精神病药、大麻素、联合治疗、加巴喷丁、拉科酰胺、单胺氧化酶抑制剂、非甾体抗炎药),两项存在发表偏倚(阿米替林、选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂)。米氮平有中等证据表明无效。度洛西汀、米那普明和普瑞巴林有中等/充分证据表明,约十分之一的中度或重度FMS疼痛成人在4至12周内疼痛得到显著缓解,且无超过六个月的疗效证据。严重不良事件的发生率并不高于安慰剂。没有证据表明哪些人可能受益或发生不良事件。其他药物没有实质性的疗效证据。
度洛西汀、米那普明和普瑞巴林有充分证据表明,约十分之一的中度或重度疼痛患者疼痛强度降低至少50%。