Suppr超能文献

多学科协作捆绑式护理对ICU气管插管患者镇痛镇静的影响。

The impact of multidisciplinary collaborative bundled care on analgesia and sedation in ICU patients with endotracheal intubation.

作者信息

Wu Xiaohui, Yu Longping

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 20;103(51):e40901. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040901.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective analgesia and sedation management play a crucial role in reducing the intensity of coughing in patients with endotracheal intubation and improving clinical outcomes. However, current approaches are predominantly singular and lack comprehensive management strategies based on multidisciplinary collaboration. This study aims to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary collaborative bundled care on analgesia and sedation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with endotracheal intubation, providing evidence to inform clinical practice.

METHODS

Seventy ICU patients were enrolled with endotracheal intubation, admitted between January and August 2024. They were divided into a control group (n = 35) receiving routine care (admitted from January to April) and an intervention group (n = 35) receiving multidisciplinary collaborative bundled care (admitted from May to August). Outcomes measured included physical restraint use, analgesic dosage, cough strength, delirium incidence, and duration of mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

The intervention group had significantly lower doses of remifentanil (8.37 ± 1.50 mg) and midazolam (21.43 ± 3.74 mg) compared to the control group (9.92 ± 1.58 and 31.12 ± 7.89 mg; P < .05). The incidence of delirium was also lower in the intervention group (11.4%) than in the control group (31.4%; P < .05). Delirium onset was delayed in the intervention group (3.02 ± 1.05 days) compared to the control group (2.58 ± 0.79 days), and its duration was shorter (3.43 ± 1.74 vs 5.12 ± 1.89 days; P < .05). Additionally, physical restraints were significantly lower in the intervention group (22.9% vs 45.7%; P < .05). Cough strength was notably higher in the intervention group (4.74 ± 0.82 vs 3.36 ± 0.76; P < .05), and the duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced (4.77 ± 1.42 vs 5.92 ± 1.66 days; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary collaborative bundled care improves sedation and analgesia outcomes in ICU patients with endotracheal intubation, reducing medication dosage, incidence of delirium, physical restraint use, and duration of mechanical ventilation while enhancing cough strength.

摘要

背景

有效的镇痛和镇静管理在降低气管插管患者的咳嗽强度及改善临床结局方面发挥着关键作用。然而,目前的方法主要是单一的,缺乏基于多学科协作的综合管理策略。本研究旨在评估多学科协作捆绑式护理对重症监护病房(ICU)气管插管患者镇痛和镇静的影响,为临床实践提供依据。

方法

纳入2024年1月至8月期间收治的70例气管插管ICU患者。将他们分为对照组(n = 35),接受常规护理(1月至4月入院)和干预组(n = 35),接受多学科协作捆绑式护理(5月至8月入院)。测量的结果包括身体约束的使用、镇痛药物剂量、咳嗽强度、谵妄发生率和机械通气时间。

结果

与对照组(瑞芬太尼9.92±1.58mg、咪达唑仑31.12±7.89mg)相比,干预组瑞芬太尼(8.37±1.50mg)和咪达唑仑(21.43±3.74mg)剂量显著更低(P <.05)。干预组谵妄发生率(11.4%)也低于对照组(31.4%;P <.05)。与对照组(2.58±0.79天)相比,干预组谵妄发作延迟(3.02±1.05天),且持续时间更短(3.43±1.74天对5.12±1.89天;P <.05)。此外,干预组身体约束显著更少(22.9%对45.7%;P <.05)。干预组咳嗽强度显著更高(4.74±0.82对3.36±0.76;P <.05),机械通气时间缩短(4.77±1.42天对5.92±1.66天;P <.05)。

结论

多学科协作捆绑式护理可改善ICU气管插管患者的镇静和镇痛效果,减少药物剂量、谵妄发生率、身体约束使用及机械通气时间,同时增强咳嗽强度。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验