Suppr超能文献

从全医院系统性实施ABCDEF集束化治疗方案中获得的经验教训:一项调查评估

Lessons Learned From a Systematic, Hospital-Wide Implementation of the ABCDEF Bundle: A Survey Evaluation.

作者信息

Brown Joan C, Ding Li, Querubin Jynette A, Peden Carol J, Barr Juliana, Cobb Joseph Perren

机构信息

Office of Performance and Transformation, Keck Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Departments of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2023 Nov 9;5(11):e1007. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001007. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We recently reported the first part of a study testing the impact of data literacy training on "assessing pain, spontaneous awakening and breathing trials, choice of analgesia and sedation, delirium monitoring/management, early exercise/mobility, and family and patient empowerment" [ABCDEF [A-F]) compliance. The purpose of the current study, part 2, was to evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation approach by surveying clinical staff to examine staff knowledge, skill, motivation, and organizational resources.

DESIGN

The Clark and Estes Gap Analysis framework was used to study knowledge, motivation, and organization (KMO) influences. Assumed influences identified in the literature were used to design the A-F bundle implementation strategies. The influences were validated against a survey distributed to the ICU interprofessional team.

SETTING

Single-center study was conducted in eight adult ICUs in a quaternary academic medical center.

SUBJECTS

Interprofessional ICU clinical team.

INTERVENTIONS

A quantitative survey was sent to 386 participants to evaluate the implementation design postimplementation. An exploratory factor analysis was performed to understand the relationship between the KMO influences and the questions posed to validate the influence. Descriptive statistics were used to identify strengths needed to sustain performance and weaknesses that required improvement to increase A-F bundle adherence.

MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS

The survey received an 83% response rate. The exploratory factor analysis confirmed that 38 of 42 questions had a strong relationship to the KMO influences, validating the survey's utility in evaluating the effectiveness of implementation design. A total of 12 KMO influences were identified, 8 were categorized as a strength and 4 as a weakness of the implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study used an evidence-based gap analysis framework to demonstrate key implementation approaches needed to increase A-F bundle compliance. The following drivers were recommended as essential methods required for successful protocol implementation: data literacy training and performance monitoring, organizational support, value proposition, multidisciplinary collaboration, and interprofessional teamwork activities. We believe the learning generated in this two-part study is applicable to implementation design beyond the A-F bundle.

摘要

目的

我们最近报告了一项研究的第一部分,该研究测试了数据素养培训对“评估疼痛、自主觉醒和呼吸试验、镇痛和镇静的选择、谵妄监测/管理、早期运动/活动,以及家庭和患者赋权”[ABCDEF(A - F)]依从性的影响。本研究的第二部分旨在通过对临床工作人员进行调查,以检查工作人员的知识、技能、动机和组织资源,来评估实施方法的有效性。

设计

采用克拉克和埃斯蒂斯差距分析框架来研究知识、动机和组织(KMO)的影响。利用文献中确定的假定影响来设计A - F束实施策略。这些影响通过分发给重症监护病房跨专业团队的一项调查进行了验证。

背景

在一家四级学术医疗中心的八个成人重症监护病房进行了单中心研究。

研究对象

重症监护病房跨专业临床团队。

干预措施

向386名参与者发送了一份定量调查问卷,以评估实施设计实施后的情况。进行了探索性因素分析,以了解KMO影响与为验证影响而提出的问题之间的关系。使用描述性统计来确定维持绩效所需的优势以及需要改进以提高A - F束依从性的弱点。

测量与结果

该调查的回复率为83%。探索性因素分析证实,42个问题中的38个与KMO影响有很强的关系,验证了该调查在评估实施设计有效性方面的效用。总共确定了12个KMO影响,其中8个被归类为实施的优势,4个为劣势。

结论

我们的研究使用了基于证据的差距分析框架,以证明提高A - F束依从性所需的关键实施方法。以下驱动因素被推荐为成功实施方案所需的基本方法:数据素养培训和绩效监测、组织支持、价值主张、多学科协作以及跨专业团队合作活动。我们相信,在这项两部分研究中产生的数据适用于A - F束之外的实施设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3669/10637401/ef2d29c8a0c2/cc9-5-e1007-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验