Health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) for adults in Japan: a delta price approach.

INTRODUCTION

This study analyzed the health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (V116) and the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20), as well as their relative cost-effectiveness, in Japanese adults aged 65 years using a delta pricing approach.

METHODS

A Markov model was employed to simulate the movement of the Japanese population among four health states: healthy, pneumococcal disease (consisting of invasive pneumococcal disease [IPD] with or without meningitis and non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia [NBPP]), post-meningitis sequelae, and death. The model was populated with publicly available demographic and epidemiologic data, stratified by risk level. Pneumococcal serotype distribution and vaccine effectiveness, as well as direct and indirect treatment costs and health-related utilities, were derived from published sources. The model used a lifetime horizon and 2% discounting of costs and life-years. Costs were adjusted to 2023 values in Japanese yen (¥). Outcomes were cases and deaths, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), vaccination and treatment costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The range over which V116 was cost-saving and cost-effective was determined.

RESULTS

Compared to PCV20, V116 averted an additional 28 cases of IPD, 918 cases of NBPP, 5 deaths from IPD, and 51 deaths from NBPP over the lifetime of a single age 65 cohort. Life-years and QALYs gained were 1,019 and 642, respectively, relative to PCV20; V116 saved ¥733 million in direct medical costs and ¥557 million in indirect costs, compared to PCV20. V116 was found to be cost-saving at price premiums up to ¥1,322 (payer perspective) or ¥2,327 (societal perspective) and remained below a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥5 million/QALY for premiums up to ¥7,113 (payer perspective) or ¥8,117 (societal perspective).

CONCLUSIONS

V116 is projected to provide more population health benefits in Japan than PCV20, and to be cost-effective at a variety of price premiums.