Pfizer SRL, Villa Adelina, Argentina.
Cytel, United Kingdom.
Vaccine. 2024 Oct 3;42(23):126043. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.06.011. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been recommended for infants in Argentina's national immunization program (NIP) in a 2 + 1 schedule since 2012. Licensure of the 15-valent vaccine (PCV15) is anticipated soon, and the 20-valent vaccine (PCV20) recently received regulatory approval. This cost-effectiveness analysis examined the public health and economic implications of transitioning from PCV13 to either PCV15 or PCV20 in Argentina's pediatric NIP.
A decision-analytic Markov model was used with a 10-year time horizon and a 3.0% annual discount rate for costs and benefits. Vaccine effectiveness estimates were derived from Argentinian surveillance data, PCV13 clinical effectiveness and impact studies, and PCV7 efficacy studies. Population, epidemiologic, and economic inputs were obtained from literature and Argentinian-specific data. The study adopted a healthcare system perspective; sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess input parameters and structural uncertainty.
Compared with PCV13, PCV20 was estimated to avert an additional 7,378, 42,884, and 172,389 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), all-cause pneumonia, and all-cause otitis media (OM), respectively, as well as 3,308 deaths, resulting in savings of United States Dollars (USD) 50,973,962 in direct medical costs. Compared with PCV15, PCV20 was also estimated to have greater benefit, averting an additional 6,140, 35,258, and 142,366 cases of IPD, pneumonia, and OM, respectively, as well as 2,624 deaths, resulting in savings of USD 37,697,868 in direct medical costs. PCV20 was associated with a higher quality-adjusted life year gain and a lower cost (i.e., dominance) versus both PCV13 and PCV15. Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses and scenario assessments.
Over a 10-year horizon, vaccination with PCV20 was expected to be the dominant, cost-saving strategy versus PCV13 and PCV15 in children in Argentina. Policymakers should consider the PCV20 vaccination strategy to achieve the greatest clinical and economic benefit compared with lower-valent options.
自 2012 年以来,13 价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV13)已被推荐用于阿根廷国家免疫规划(NIP)中的 2+1 接种程序。预计即将批准 15 价疫苗(PCV15),而 20 价疫苗(PCV20)最近已获得监管部门批准。本项成本效益分析研究了在阿根廷儿科 NIP 中从 PCV13 转换为 PCV15 或 PCV20 的公共卫生和经济影响。
采用决策分析马尔可夫模型,时间范围为 10 年,成本和效益的贴现率为 3.0%。疫苗效力估计值来自阿根廷监测数据、PCV13 临床效果和影响研究以及 PCV7 疗效研究。人口、流行病学和经济投入数据来源于文献和阿根廷特定数据。该研究采用了医疗保健系统的观点;进行了敏感性和情景分析,以评估投入参数和结构不确定性。
与 PCV13 相比,PCV20 估计可分别额外预防 7378、42884 和 172389 例侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)、所有原因肺炎和所有原因中耳炎(OM),并可预防 3308 例死亡,从而节省 50973962 美元的直接医疗费用。与 PCV15 相比,PCV20 也具有更大的益处,额外预防 6140、35258 和 142366 例 IPD、肺炎和 OM,以及 2624 例死亡,从而节省 37697868 美元的直接医疗费用。与 PCV13 和 PCV15 相比,PCV20 具有更高的质量调整生命年获益和更低的成本(即优势)。在敏感性分析和情景评估中,结果仍然稳健。
在 10 年的时间内,与 PCV13 和 PCV15 相比,阿根廷儿童接种 PCV20 预计将成为具有成本效益的主导策略。决策者应考虑采用 PCV20 接种策略,以获得与较低价疫苗相比最大的临床和经济效益。