Duff Kevin, Vehar Julia V, Weintraub Daniel
Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road (Mail Code: CR131), Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 1530 E Rm. 701, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2025 Feb;131:107245. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107245. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Although practice effects (PE) on repeated cognitive testing have received growing interest in Alzheimer's disease, they have been understudied in Parkinson's disease (PD). The current paper examined PE across one week in a sample of patients with PD via traditional methods and regression-based change scores, as well as if these change scores relate to clinical variables in PD.
Thirty-five patients with PD were administered a brief cognitive battery twice across approximately one week. Using both simple-difference and standardized regression-based change scores, a series of one-sample and independent t-tests were calculated to assess for PE across the test battery. Pearson correlations examined both types of change scores and measures of mood and severity of motor symptoms.
Whereas traditional analyses (i.e., simple difference scores and dependent t-tests) did not reveal any changes on test scores over this interval, regression-based change scores did identify that these individuals showed significantly smaller-than-expected PE on three of the seven cognitive scores. Furthermore, when these regression-based change scores were trichotomized (decline/stable/improve), four of the seven tests showed significantly more decline than expected in this sample. Finally, these regression-based change scores significantly correlated with motor measures, with smaller PE being associated with worse motor functioning.
Although these results are preliminary and need to be replicated in larger and more diverse samples, smaller-than-expected PE are seen in PD and they may signal more advanced disease.
尽管重复认知测试中的练习效应(PE)在阿尔茨海默病中受到越来越多的关注,但在帕金森病(PD)中却研究不足。本文通过传统方法和基于回归的变化分数,对一组帕金森病患者在一周内的练习效应进行了研究,同时还探讨了这些变化分数是否与帕金森病的临床变量相关。
35名帕金森病患者在大约一周的时间内接受了两次简短的认知测试。使用简单差异分数和基于标准化回归的变化分数,计算了一系列单样本和独立t检验,以评估整个测试组中的练习效应。Pearson相关性分析了两种类型的变化分数与情绪和运动症状严重程度的测量指标之间的关系。
传统分析(即简单差异分数和相关t检验)未发现该时间段内测试分数有任何变化,而基于回归的变化分数确实表明,这些个体在七个认知分数中的三个上表现出比预期显著更小的练习效应。此外,当将这些基于回归的变化分数分为三类(下降/稳定/改善)时,七个测试中的四个显示该样本中的下降比预期显著更多。最后,这些基于回归的变化分数与运动测量指标显著相关,练习效应越小,运动功能越差。
尽管这些结果是初步的,需要在更大、更多样化的样本中进行重复验证,但帕金森病患者中观察到的练习效应小于预期,这可能预示着疾病更为严重。