Department of Neurology, Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Department of Neurology, Center for Alzheimer's Care, Imaging and Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(1):321-332. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231392.
Practice effects on cognitive testing in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain understudied, especially with how they compare to biomarkers of AD.
The current study sought to add to this growing literature.
Cognitively intact older adults (n = 68), those with amnestic MCI (n = 52), and those with mild AD (n = 45) completed a brief battery of cognitive tests at baseline and again after one week, and they also completed a baseline amyloid PET scan, a baseline MRI, and a baseline blood draw to obtain APOE ɛ4 status.
The intact participants showed significantly larger baseline cognitive scores and practice effects than the other two groups on overall composite measures. Those with MCI showed significantly larger baseline scores and practice effects than AD participants on the composite. For amyloid deposition, the intact participants had significantly less tracer uptake, whereas MCI and AD participants were comparable. For total hippocampal volumes, all three groups were significantly different in the expected direction (intact > MCI > AD). For APOE ɛ4, the intact had significantly fewer copies of ɛ4 than MCI and AD. The effect sizes of the baseline cognitive scores and practice effects were comparable, and they were significantly larger than effect sizes of biomarkers in 7 of the 9 comparisons.
Baseline cognition and short-term practice effects appear to be sensitive markers in late life cognitive disorders, as they separated groups better than commonly-used biomarkers in AD. Further development of baseline cognition and short-term practice effects as tools for clinical diagnosis, prognostic indication, and enrichment of clinical trials seems warranted.
在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)中,认知测试的练习效应仍研究不足,尤其是与 AD 的生物标志物相比时。
本研究旨在对此不断增长的文献做出补充。
认知正常的老年人(n=68)、有遗忘型 MCI(n=52)和轻度 AD(n=45)在基线和一周后分别完成了简短的认知测试组合,并且还进行了基线淀粉样蛋白 PET 扫描、基线 MRI 和基线血液检测以获得 APOE ɛ4 状态。
在整体综合测量中,完整组的参与者在基线认知评分和练习效应上明显大于其他两组。MCI 组在综合得分上的基线评分和练习效应明显大于 AD 组。对于淀粉样蛋白沉积,完整组的示踪剂摄取明显较少,而 MCI 和 AD 组则相当。对于总海马体积,三组的预期方向都有显著差异(完整组> MCI 组> AD 组)。对于 APOE ɛ4,完整组的 ɛ4 拷贝数明显少于 MCI 和 AD。基线认知评分和短期练习效应的效应量相当,并且在 9 个比较中有 7 个的效应量明显大于生物标志物。
在生命后期认知障碍中,基线认知和短期练习效应似乎是敏感的标志物,因为它们比 AD 中常用的生物标志物更好地将各组分开。进一步将基线认知和短期练习效应开发为临床诊断、预后指示和临床试验富集的工具似乎是合理的。