Zarich S, Fang L S, Diamond J R
Arch Intern Med. 1985 Jan;145(1):108-12.
Determining the cause of acutely deteriorating renal function is a common problem in clinical nephrology. The fractional excretion of filtered sodium (FENa) has been demonstrated to be a reliably discriminating test between prerenal azotemia and acute tubular necrosis. However, with increasing clinical use of the FENa, numerous reports of low FENa (less than 1%) have appeared. The clinical settings of these reports include oliguric and nonoliguric acute tubular necrosis, urinary tract obstruction, acute glomerulonephritis, hepatorenal syndrome, renal allograft rejection, sepsis, and drug-related alterations in renal hemodynamics. One particular urinary index cannot be expected to reliably discriminate between prerenal azotemia and acute renal failure in all cases. The utility of the FENa test in the differential diagnosis of acute renal failure must be interpreted in conjunction with the patient's clinical course and the use of additional urinary and serum tests.
确定急性肾功能恶化的原因是临床肾脏病学中的常见问题。滤过钠排泄分数(FENa)已被证明是区分肾前性氮质血症和急性肾小管坏死的可靠检测方法。然而,随着FENa在临床中的应用越来越广泛,出现了许多FENa降低(低于1%)的报告。这些报告中的临床情况包括少尿型和非少尿型急性肾小管坏死、尿路梗阻、急性肾小球肾炎、肝肾综合征、肾移植排斥反应、败血症以及药物相关的肾血流动力学改变。不能期望单一的尿液指标在所有情况下都能可靠地区分肾前性氮质血症和急性肾衰竭。FENa检测在急性肾衰竭鉴别诊断中的效用必须结合患者的临床病程以及其他尿液和血清检测结果来解读。